Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: Hone sizes... ugh...
-
06-24-2009, 05:23 AM #1
Hone sizes... ugh...
I have been playing with my hones lately (minds out of the gutter ) and have come to a conclusion that I really don't like a 3x8" hone for older straights. Even the newer ones with some use on them seem to have issues with such wide hones. I have one razor that does well on the 3x8 hone, my TI LE SRP blade.
The 1.5" and or 2" wide hones really seem to work best for me. I don't know if it's the hone themselves or the size... but I really like the feel and useability of the thinner hones. 1.5"x 6-8" really do it for me.
How about you?
-
06-24-2009, 05:30 AM #2
Definitely prefer a more narrow hone. I cut my norton in half for exactly that reason! The best width I've found is between 1"-2", 1.5" being the preferrable width for me. I does take a little more practice using a narrower hone as it's more difficult keeping the blade flat, but it's well worth it for me. Look at this picture of my stones, the 2" coticule is the widest of all my naturals (the 6 on the left) and the norton 4k/8k is now only about 1.5" wide.
So I'm right there with you when it comes to preferring thinner hones.
-
06-24-2009, 06:31 AM #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 786
Thanked: 132
-
06-24-2009, 06:44 AM #4
There was a while when I really didn't like wider hones, but I came to realize that it's more about how you use the hone than how big it is. I do think that with warped blades a narrow hone will probably always be easier, but for smilers or mildly uneven hone wear, I've found that I can comfortably use 1.5 to 2 inches of a 3 inch wide hone. Now I'm coming to prefer wider hones because it gives me the ability to choose how much of the width I want to use. I also find it easier to keep slurry on a wider hone, which allows me to dilute quite slowly (when I want to).
I will stress, though, that I think it's all about personal preference.
-
06-24-2009, 11:50 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Bangkok, Thailand
- Posts
- 1,659
Thanked: 235I prefer the wider hones. But that may also reflect my honing skills.
-
06-24-2009, 12:08 PM #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 1,928
Thanked: 402I'm with Holli.
2" and a bit. Length doesn't matter so much to me though.
I can do with 6"
-
06-24-2009, 08:43 PM #7
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Phoenix
- Posts
- 1,125
Thanked: 156Length doesn't matter to me as I can always shorten or lengthen the stroke. I like the versatility of 8" though, but can use 6" just fine. 2" or 2.5" is perfect for me. I really like the size of the Naniwas. Can't complain.
-
06-24-2009, 09:00 PM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sussex, UK
- Posts
- 1,710
Thanked: 234I think the widest stone I have is about 2" - I'm used to narrower ones and the extra width is of no real use to me at all to be honest.
Length is more useful, but I'm quite comfortable with my 6" coti.
-
06-24-2009, 09:01 PM #9
I prefer 1-2 inch. That's especially good for razors that have e.g. a blunt toe or heel end and the ones with a big smile.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.
-
06-24-2009, 09:16 PM #10
I like anything over 7/8" wide by 4" in length, with a preferred upper limit of around 2" x 6". I still use the smaller sizes more often than my 2" x 6" hones; even for big knives. I like to hand hold the hone. My everyday "workhorses" are the ones in my avatar (4 1/3" long).
For lapping 3" x 8" plus is nice.