Results 11 to 20 of 20
Thread: Bevel is wider on one side?
-
03-25-2011, 06:08 PM #11
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,623
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371Or a warped blade or a blade with a spine thickness that's not uniform, or a blade with metal that's not of uniform thickness at the edge...
Especially if the OP is doing x-strokes it's unlikely that the hones being flat or not is the culprit here. You have mentioned in several posts that you bought wide hones so as to not have to do x-strokes. In that case an unlapped hone can cause problems like this. The x-stroke greatly reduces that possibility.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
03-25-2011, 06:13 PM #12
-
03-25-2011, 06:54 PM #13
Not true Speed of light in vacuum is the same across all frequencies/wavelengths, and not in vacuum the dispersion can be either way depending on the specific material
But of course, apart from my nitpicking, color contrast can be much better depending on the particular lighting situation, so it's great advice.
-
03-25-2011, 07:10 PM #14
-
03-25-2011, 07:46 PM #15
+1 to HSNB I have a blade that looks flat on the edge but when the spine is on a flat surface the blade edge kicks up in the toe, so I had to either breadknife it or tape the spine till the edge is flat on both sides.
-
03-25-2011, 09:17 PM #16
-
03-25-2011, 10:10 PM #17
I think that your spine is flat/even on one side but not the other. Wider in the middle on the side that is giving you issues. Your hand is pushing down on the heel end and rocking it that way lifting the toe. An X stroke should help that issue since it is wider in the middle.
I just had a related issue with one that is narrower in the middle of the spine on one side. One bevel looked perfect. ( At least to me!) The other was wider in the middle of the bevel. Now if the edge was warped it would show up on the other side as well but it didn't. I measured the spine thickness with a caliper and found the narrow part of the spine corresponded with the wide spot in the bevel. Leading just by a little bit. I think that the x stroke in that instance contributed to the problem. As the narow spot in the spine approached the edge of the hone it changed the angle of the bevel. If I would have just laid the blade flat on the stone the spine would have rode on the high spots at each end and kept an even angle accross the whole bevel. It sharpened up good so I am going to leave it alone for now but it doesn't look right on that side.
TimLast edited by 32t; 03-26-2011 at 03:00 AM.
-
03-26-2011, 03:55 AM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Pequea, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 2,290
Thanked: 375Bevel is wider on one side the other side looks perfect to me very narrow the whole length of the blade. Hone wear is uneven on the spine, middle on one side and the other is toward the toe. I don't have a stone to lapp my hones. What are my options until I can purchase a lapping stone? Sandpaper, scotchbright?
-
03-26-2011, 03:57 AM #19
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Pequea, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 2,290
Thanked: 375This sounds like the exact problem I'm having. I think I'll try a marker on the edge, to see where I'm messing up.
-
03-26-2011, 04:08 AM #20
You can use 325 grit sandpaper to lap your hones. Flat surface and plenty of water to wash away swarf. See this illustrated tutorial by Josh Earl here.
It is not at all unusual for a razor to have a wider bevel on one side or the other, one end or the other. These things aren't always perfectly symmetrical. This is why x and rolling x strokes come into play. If you can get a good shaving edge on it evenly symmetrical bevels, while desirable aesthetically, don't matter.Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:
Trimmy72 (03-26-2011)