Results 21 to 22 of 22
Thread: Joel's reviews / Puma Gold ???
-
08-24-2007, 11:09 PM #21
Obviously. In adjusted dollars, the average wage has increased roughly $11.4K since 1967.
I think what I meant to say was not salary keeping up with inflation, but the inflated prices of razors. If you go to the inflation calculator and enter the average salary of 1967 ($28600) for the value, enter the initial year as 1967 and the final year as 2005, you will get a final value of $166K, i.e., if you were making $28.6k in 1967, you were doing pretty well. (this is erronious information and is irrelevant for this discussion though)
Of note, below this it says that in 2005 dollars, $28.6K was the equivalent to ~$5k in 1967 dollars. So if the census bureau was reporting salary in 2005 adjusted dollars, that means your paycheck would be like $100 for a 40 hour work week back in 1967. At roughly $2.50 an hour wage, you can see that a $7 razor was like 3 hours worth of salary.
But onto my argument for salary keeping up with the rising prices of razors...
Based on inflation alone, the $7 razor would be worth $40 today. This is equivalently a 5.7X increase. Likewise, the $5K you would have been making in 1967 would be equivalent to $28.6K now (also about a 5.7X increase). It should be clear that the rate of inflation between 1967 and 2005 is about 5.7X.
By todays standards a man making the average $40K a year is earning an $800 a week pay check for a 40 hour week. That's like $20 an hour. If he were to spend the same 3 hours salary on a razor, he should be able to buy a $60 razor. But the cost of the razor we said should have only inflated to $40. So salary is keeping up with inflation.
But a new straight razor isn't $40, or even $60 any more. Now I see prices of commercially made blades from DoVo and TI for $100-$200. NOS blades are equivalently as expensive. That's almost a day's pay depending on how much you spend. My point was that in the coming future, at this rate, a razor will cost a week's pay.
-
08-25-2007, 12:28 AM #22
Ahhh . . . so you're saying razor prices are increasing faster than salaries. Fair enough!
Edit: your extrapolation argument seems as good a reason as any to buy more razors now.Last edited by SteveS; 08-25-2007 at 02:05 AM.