Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,486
    Thanked: 953

    Default Why are the Classic Filarmonicas so different?

    Has anyone figured out why the classic shaving filarmonicas (the 15/16s monsters) (which were supposed to the last in inventory) are such different animals from the old fashioned NOS filarmonica doble temples with the pastel scales?

    When it's honed right (and that takes some dedication), the classic shaving fily is a nice instrument. But it's not in the same class as the beautiful old filies that take an edge immediately and shave so so well.

    Were the last blanks just not ground by the same skilled filarmonica grinders? Did they fail to find a good retired razor maker (unlike whoever got all those old friodur blanks)?

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    Maybe that's why they went out of business: they started making poor quality razors.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  3. #3
    Know thyself holli4pirating's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    11,930
    Thanked: 2559

    Default

    IMO, from the razors I have seen, they are not the same blanks at all.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    54
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    According to Leon:

    I've honed some of these and they're a PITA to hone due to their hard steel. Also, they're thicker than the original 60's Filarmonicas that I love and needless to say I prefer the older ones than these more modern ones.
    Apart from this model, I've also had several customers from Spain that occasionally buy one of the last Filarmonica models in some old Spanish cutleries. The blade shape is just like CS with the exception that it still has the "Double Temple" etching on the blade and has the Filarmonica 14 scales.
    This model is what I baptized as "13.5", since it's too big to be a 13 and too small to be a "14", thus needing to have the "14" scales, the "13" would be too small.
    Also, being thicker in the edge is what also takes more time in the hones to set a bevel. This bevel usually gets much more pronounced than the 60's "13" that have a much more light and narrow edge and the edge is practically invisible.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    54
    Thanked: 4

  6. #6
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,765
    Thanked: 5017
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I don't think they are poorer quality razors or at least the one I have shaves fine. As to why they are different there can be many reasons. maybe they started getting rid of the older employees, maybe they started making a newer type razor thinking they could continue, maybe they couldn't get the old blanks anymore. The possibilities are endless.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    106
    Thanked: 81

    Default

    Are there any links out there detailing the history of the Filarmonica, especially the plant, grinders, etc..?

  8. #8
    50 year str. shaver mrsell63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pothole County, PA
    Posts
    2,258
    Thanked: 522
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I'm not familiar with the Filarmonica models or their various charateristics, I only have this one. Can anyone tell me which model it is (13 or 14 ) and is it an older or newer model? I'm guessing it is a newer model.

    Thanks in advance for your help. It is a great shaver.........
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    JERRY
    OOOPS! Pass the styptic please.

  9. #9
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,765
    Thanked: 5017
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    That looks like the new ones to me.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to thebigspendur For This Useful Post:

    mrsell63 (03-29-2010)

  11. #10
    Senior Member krisbarger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    308
    Thanked: 10

    Default

    I had a post about this a few months back because I bout one of these off of a guy on ebay. Every one thought it was a "chinese fake". How ever it turned out that it was indeed real. Just did not have the marking on the tang that the other older ones have.

    From what I could gather from the guys with more years doing this than me(leon Max), these one CS has and the one I bought from Spain "that are identical" are made from a different steel. Not the old spanish steel. That would have to explain the diff in honing and general ease of working with.

    When I found out this was indeed a real one just a different steel then I sold it (at a discount) and went a different route.

    Hope this helps.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •