Results 1 to 10 of 14
Thread: A bit help
-
09-17-2012, 04:24 PM #1
A bit help
I´ll post an image of a quite interesting razor, with the scale made of horn an the washers in rossette, the maker mak is completly loosed but you can see a ....Crown R and the last letters, by the form of the scale and blade I thik could be G crown R but is better the professors say anathin about it, thanks
-
09-17-2012, 08:07 PM #2
Nice! Can we see the blade also?
-
09-17-2012, 08:36 PM #3
It looks suspiciously like a rasor of mine, a Wada & Butler.
Scales and rosette washers seem similar. I love mine.
See the thread here
-
09-17-2012, 08:38 PM #4
You have a very nice , very old razor . It most likely dates to the latter part of the 1700's . The crown , along with the letters GR , means the razor was made during the reign of King George , of England . You're very lucky to have such a razor , please don't mess it up .
-
09-18-2012, 12:01 PM #5
Tomorrow, because I haben´t here now the razor here, I´ll post more photos with it open sown the blade , (if i could i´ll post it todaw) Unfortunely you´ll could see that the first letter down the rest of the crown is lost, and iI only can make congetures with the form of the crown, I´ll post too a frontal blade photo, because I need you´ll help me with the proportions you use I cant understand many thanks at all, and waigth for the rest images, the form of the blade is strage
-
09-18-2012, 12:02 PM #6
-
09-18-2012, 12:09 PM #7
Yes STR8Fencer the only diference I can see across my ignorance is that mine habe not stairs in blade, well I´m trying splain mysef, if you look yours the blade is like a T mote or less, do you undertand? because I´m not sure I´m undertanding I said but mine makes a triangle, well more or less too....OH! it´s a bit dificult, thanks nevertheless
-
09-18-2012, 12:22 PM #8
-
09-19-2012, 10:01 AM #9
More Photos, you post the photo of the blade´s front, I, at the moment, can´t discover why but I´ll do it too, waigting your opinion and the use of this images, tahks and enjoy the picks
-
09-19-2012, 09:51 PM #10
I was mistaken , your razor is not as old as I thought . Now that I see the blade , I'm thinking 1820- 1850 . It's still a very nice razor , just not quite as old as I thought .