Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Like Tree27Likes

Thread: understanding how price vs. quality of a razor

  1. #11
    Senior Member UKRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    West Midlands, UK
    Posts
    1,263
    Thanked: 360

    Default

    There are some brands that are popular and therefore, tend to attract premium prices - I'm thinking Duble Duck and Filarmonica - neither are what you would call scarce so there is a big element of demand driving prices up. Having said that, they do not get their reputation for nothing and both are fine makes - my limited experience of both is that the Filarmonica takes some beating whereas the DD is similar to Henckels Friodur and the Swedish razors, but definitely cost more.

    As the market for the big, old near wedges shows, Wade & Burtcher is still the brand in demand - again jistifiably so as they are very fine shavers. Whether they are any better than a whole host of similar age Sheffields is a moot point.

    As a beginner you could probably take 200 different razors of all prices and, provided they were shave ready - you would probably not be able to 'feel' a difference in quality. You may well find a preference for size, shape, weight, grind or looks, but that's a different matter.

    I'm going to make a prediction now - my prediction is that once you have your first razor and find that straight shaving is for you, then you'll start looking at these premium priced razors, ignore all the advice you have been given so far, and start justifying to yourself why you should have one.

  2. #12
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,947
    Thanked: 13221
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    There are actually differences in the Vintage and the New Production razors besides just looks..

    The are differences in the steels used, the process of hardening and tempering, and obvious differences in the grinds...

    You simply have to search for the info for the New production stuff.

    On Vintage razors it is a little harder to figure it all out, as much of the info was either hidden or greatly exaggerated so discerning the truth isn't so easy
    WW243 and Chevhead like this.

  3. #13
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Damascus is actually a generic moniker for 'pattern welded steel.' There are differences in formulas used in making up the final product, and the resulting alloy may make a difference in feel, how difficult it is to hone, and shave quality. IME a 'damascus' razor, and I've tried quite a few, is not necessarily better than a regular blade, but not worse. So aesthetics is the driver behind those. You have your stainless blades, high carbon, and some that have gimmicks such as lead hardening, that give the steels different qualities in honing if not in actual shaving. So there are subtle differences. Dovo, Ralf Aust and Theirs-Issard are some of the razors that I've personally taken a liking to.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    226
    Thanked: 44

    Default

    I've always had trouble with discerning what would separate an average shaver with a good hone job from a great shaver with a good hone job. There are a LOT of brands that get touted as "excellent" or "some of my best shavers", but I rarely hear what they are better than.

    In putting razor to face, I won't much notice the edge hardness unless it is extremely low. I'm much more likely to prefer based on tang shape and length, blade profile, degree of hollow to the grind, blade weight and width, and honing quality. A part of me still wants to focus on the steel and heat treat, but I cannot from my shaves tell you if my Cattaraugus, Tosuke, Iwasaki, or anything else, has a superior steel or heat treat. Perhaps from honing wear I can pick things apart, but if someone told me my Tosuke was harder than my Iwasaki (which is probably not true), I couldn't from shaving experience confirm or deny the claim.

    Good luck trying to get more info.
    Last edited by Tierdaen; 05-07-2013 at 03:57 PM.

  5. #15
    Senior Member blabbermouth Hirlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    13,530
    Thanked: 3530

    Default "understanding how price vs. quality of a razor"

    Before I donate my 2 cents;
    WW243 gave you a path to follow, to start you in this journey. The SRP forum is so deep in information with regard to a razor's price vs quality, it's like stepping off your 21' open fisherman into the Marianas Trench. Look a little closer by using the "Advanced Search" button, top right & putting in keywords that interest you. This returns the threads related to your interests. Members, including myself, love to answer your posts, but why limit yourself with only the replies in this thread.

    First, in giving advice to a new person such as yourself, with regard to wet shaving, I would focus on the quality of the shave & don't tunnel vision on the "quality" of the razor. The end result of the shave is what I seek. I have gotten great shaves from $40.00 vintage blades from the classified section, a $7.00 antique store rescue & $250.00 Dovo's. To use your own analogy of cameras; as a young man I got into photography via a friend. He carried a simple Pentax SLR camera; I went out & bought an Olympus SLR with all the toys that fit it, 3X's the investment I made. His photos were always better than mine; because he was a better photographer. Three years later, I also bought a Pentax, still had crappy photos.

    The razor that gives you a good comfortable shave at the beginning of your day, is a quality razor.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Hirlau For This Useful Post:

    cudarunner (05-09-2013)

  7. #16
    Member JoeBass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    76
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    At least with the vintage blades I use, IMHO, price has absolutely nothing to do with quality. I have some of the more pricey vintage brands (Puma, DD, Filarmonica) and many unknown razors that would sell for next to nothing due to lack of name recognition, and once they're all honed properly they're all excellent shavers. I've never bothered with modern blades, and why would I when I can get a beautiful, excellently made vintage blade for under $50.00. Case in point (no razor puns intended) this Tucker Regent in excellent condition, picked up at a local antique store for $40.00.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Hirlau and Chevhead like this.

  8. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Florence, SC
    Posts
    449
    Thanked: 121

    Default

    The key to your question is what you mean by "quality." I assume you mean closeness and comfort of the shave. The most expensive razor I have is a mediocre shaver that resists all attempts (even by professional honers) to bring it up to first tier. My best quality Dovo is a first-tier razor.

    So I would agree with some of the earlier responders: there is NO correlation between cost and quality -- as defined above.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •