Results 11 to 20 of 22
Thread: M. Salt & Sons anybody??
-
07-12-2013, 09:24 AM #11
Well....... The razor came in the post this morning, what a stunner. I'm really pleased with it. It actually has 'cutlers to...' Stamped on the rand but no 'England' stamp so I guess il have to re date it 1854-1890ish then??!! Anyway, here are some pics. I love the style of the tang, and the blade is in superb nick. The scales are nice and tight with no cracks or damage at all and even the box is near mint. I'm very pleased.
-
07-12-2013, 11:15 AM #12
What a nice ivory razor, I have bet on this particular one but I wasn't generous enought !
-
07-12-2013, 11:37 AM #13
I was at my limit myself, I'm glad I won though.
-
07-12-2013, 12:03 PM #14
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Posts
- 5,782
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 4249Indeed, a very nice razor, superb condition, your new dating seems appropriate, Enjoy!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Martin103 For This Useful Post:
Manchestertattoo (07-12-2013)
-
07-12-2013, 04:02 PM #15
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 3,816
Thanked: 3164That's a beauty for sure.
Martins ad from the aussie newspaper is dated 1874 and calls the firm 'Salt & Sons' so I suppose that you are OK up to or shortly before this date. Seems like they regularly changed names - I have come across at least five so far, four of those from 1970 onwards!
Regards,
Neil
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Neil Miller For This Useful Post:
Manchestertattoo (07-12-2013)
-
07-12-2013, 04:37 PM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 3,816
Thanked: 3164Your cut-off date now appears to be 1854:
After that the company name changed from M. Salt & Son to simply Salt & Son. They won an award under this name in 1873:
and lasted until 1883:
After which the name changed again.
Regards,
Neil
-
07-12-2013, 04:39 PM #17
So it's pre '54 then? I'm a little confused now!!!
-
07-12-2013, 04:43 PM #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 3,816
Thanked: 3164Not really confusing - just proof that the written word is better than memory - John Salt evidently got it wrong when he said 'cutlers to her majesty' was awarded in '54.
Either that, or they were still using the mark. Several of the companies they have now incorporate their name, but are 'non-trading' companies.
Regards,
Neil
-
07-12-2013, 04:49 PM #19
Ahh, I see. Well at least I have a ball park figure. I always like to learn a little history about my razors and yet again Neil you have been an invaluable source of information!!! Many thanks!!!
-
07-12-2013, 07:04 PM #20
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Posts
- 5,782
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 4249Interesting Neil, the more you dig, the more you actually find the truth, that why i like old newspaper article, usually what is written just happen the day before.