Results 1 to 10 of 15
Thread: H Birke Meat Chopper
-
08-16-2014, 03:52 PM #1
H Birke Meat Chopper
I acquired this one awhile back on eBay for a pretty good deal. I can't find any info on it in any of my references but it is a nice meat chopper. The shank says "H Birke" on it. It is 8/8 at the widest point & at least 1/4" thick at the spine. I still need to hone it & see how good she shaves.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to engine46 For This Useful Post:
cheetahmeatpheonix (03-27-2016), ejmolitor37 (08-02-2017), Oldnick (03-22-2016)
-
08-16-2014, 06:44 PM #2
That's a beautiful old razor,,,,,
-
08-16-2014, 06:47 PM #3
-
08-16-2014, 07:14 PM #4
It's a Magnum Bonum style blade. Circa 1810-1815. The name on the tang is most likely Birks, rather than Birke, as there were lots of Birks running around in Sheffield and no Birkes.
That first letter is mysterious though It really does look like an H or an M, and all the right guys in the basic timeframe were Js and Ws.
Any chance you could get a clearer picture of the tang?
(Based on all the ones I've handled, it'll shave wonderfully!)-Zak Jarvis. Writer. Artist. Bon vivant.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Voidmonster For This Useful Post:
cheetahmeatpheonix (03-27-2016), engine46 (03-20-2016), Wullie (08-16-2014)
-
08-16-2014, 07:52 PM #5
Zak, you're right, after I cleaned it off with some 1k grit Wet or Dry the first letter looks more like an M especially when looking at it in person it looks like an M more than it does an H. The last letter could also be an S. It just might be the way the stamps were made back then.
-
08-16-2014, 08:14 PM #6
What usually happened is just that the stamps got worn with use, so letters became less distinct over time, or in that case, it looks like it was struck a little too deeply. If you ground about 1/10mm off the surface, the letter would be clearer (I don't recommend doing that though!)
The first letter looks really an awful lot like an M or an H and there aren't any directory listings for an M* or H* Birks.
Now there was a famous Henry Birks, jeweler from Montreal, but the timeframe is wrong for him to have commissioned razors (he was working in the 1860's), and his father's name was Richard. So that's a dead-end. An end that wasn't really ever even alive.
However the apprentice registers show that John Birks apprenticed one Henry Birks (son of Richard -- John's brother?). Henry was freed in 1795, which has him working in a likely time-frame.
There were two other Henrys apprenticed. The first was freed in 1720, meaning he would have caught a nasty case of dead by the time your razor was made and the other never completed his apprenticeship (which began in 1804, to Jonathan Shackerley, a knife maker).
In the apprentice rolls, there are no M* Birks.
So, my best guess is Henry Birks, around 1810.-Zak Jarvis. Writer. Artist. Bon vivant.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Voidmonster For This Useful Post:
cheetahmeatpheonix (03-27-2016), Geezer (08-01-2017), karlej (07-24-2017)
-
08-16-2014, 08:24 PM #7
Very nice....jimps and a smile...I'd take it out for a nice dinner if it had....great find!
-
08-16-2014, 09:14 PM #8
I'll go with that for now unless something else comes up later.
-
08-16-2014, 09:41 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Sacramento
- Posts
- 79
Thanked: 22Great looking blade in beautiful shape!
Void, always a pleasure reading your posts.
In Christ
SB
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Steeleback For This Useful Post:
Voidmonster (08-16-2014)
-
08-16-2014, 10:09 PM #10
Nice fat stumpy indeed
Saved,
to shave another day.