Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44
Like Tree24Likes

Thread: Chinese 12k

  1. #31
    Senior Member blabbermouth engine46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    7,810
    Thanked: 1744
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cosperryan View Post
    Why would you do that. Have you even tried it yet? Its a natural, they vary, thats what they do. You know I have a coticule that is so smooth it makes butter jealous, then I have a coticule that is courser than the BBW side of it. Do I regret buying it. No I do not. It is still a very useful stone. When I bought my Chinese stone, I was apprehensive about its capabilities. Everyone described the indicators of a bad stone and mine seemed to have all those qualities. Did I turn it around and sell it? No I figured out a place for it in my progression. Then guess what after a while I finally figured out how to truly use it. Its not a bad stone at all. It rivals my best finisher. Did I have to buy 4 of them to find the best one? No, I got lucky and got a good one even though I didn't know it at first. Not saying your is crap or not but don't assume the stone is crap just because some one else said they vary in quality and the one he got from wood craft sucked. It doesn't mean yours sucks. You have to try for yourself before you can say whether its crap or not. Then that too even depends on variables. Maybe it won't work for you but maybe for someone else they can get it too work because their skill is different.

    People always go on about the JNATs too. Do you know how often those things vary from one extreme to the next? A stupid amount. Coticules too. Yet people are always buying them praising them too.

    Natural hone threads are all the same just with a different name.
    All due respect I already did say that I was going to keep it & try it.
    Thank you.
    Steel likes this.

  2. #32
    Senior Member blabbermouth Hirlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    13,530
    Thanked: 3530

    Default

    I have 2 PHIGS from Woodcraft, both are excellent finishers.
    Many members don't take the time to read the Pros/Cons threads that are available on SRP, then they purchase a PHIG & hone with it as though t's a Shapton 16, Or Naniwa 12.
    Being a natural stone it can vary in the performance from one members stone to another.
    Steel likes this.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hirlau For This Useful Post:

    engine46 (08-23-2014), Steel (08-23-2014)

  4. #33
    Senior Member cosperryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Orlando, FL.
    Posts
    878
    Thanked: 107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by engine46 View Post
    All due respect I already did say that I was going to keep it & try it.
    Thank you.
    Yeah, sorry I type slow. It only appeared after I posted and the paged refreshed.

  5. #34
    Senior Member rodb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanked: 433

    Default

    My C12K is probably my most used finisher, it's very slow so I do three sets of 20 1/2 x-strokes per side, a set of circles then 50 x-strokes. I get super edges that way
    Hirlau, Steel and engine46 like this.

  6. #35
    Senior Member blabbermouth engine46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    7,810
    Thanked: 1744
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cosperryan View Post
    Yeah, sorry I type slow. It only appeared after I posted and the paged refreshed.
    Thank you, I type slow too and I'm not here to start an argument or anything like that. I only said what I said because anything else from China is what it is & I normally don't buy anything from there but I was wrong due to the fact it is a natural stone. I own Shapton, Naniwa & Norton stones & even a Coticule I bought from SRD & they all work great so I feel as though I will have good results with it one way or another. Thank you for your comment.
    Last edited by engine46; 08-23-2014 at 01:24 AM.
    Steel likes this.

  7. #36
    Senior Member blabbermouth engine46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    7,810
    Thanked: 1744
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rodb View Post
    My C12K is probably my most used finisher, it's very slow so I do three sets of 20 1/2 x-strokes per side, a set of circles then 50 x-strokes. I get super edges that way
    I will try that when i get mine. Thank you!

  8. #37
    Historically Inquisitive Martin103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    5,782
    Thanked: 4249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    In chatting with a very reputable Honemeister he told me the Phig's was his finisher of choice for all swedish razors......

  9. #38
    Member babarog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    80
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    I just have to say that the whole point there are no grit on natural stones I find freaking ridiculous!

    I mean grit is determined by the particle size from which a stone consists and although its hard to determine the size of the particle it isn't impossible!

    If any1 knows why they dont just say the equivalent grit I'd be much appreciative!
    Have a nice day!

    Gallery: http://babarog.imgur.com

  10. #39
    Senior Member blabbermouth engine46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    7,810
    Thanked: 1744
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by babarog View Post
    I just have to say that the whole point there are no grit on natural stones I find freaking ridiculous!

    I mean grit is determined by the particle size from which a stone consists and although its hard to determine the size of the particle it isn't impossible!

    If any1 knows why they dont just say the equivalent grit I'd be much appreciative!
    Not to change the subject but I saw a grit/micron crossover chart on here somewhere, I think in the Library but now I can't find it. It could be of some help.

  11. #40
    Historically Inquisitive Martin103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    5,782
    Thanked: 4249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by babarog View Post
    I just have to say that the whole point there are no grit on natural stones I find freaking ridiculous!

    I mean grit is determined by the particle size from which a stone consists and although its hard to determine the size of the particle it isn't impossible!

    If any1 knows why they dont just say the equivalent grit I'd be much appreciative!
    For the simple reason that every individual stone would have to be tested, natural stones vary so much.
    gssixgun likes this.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Martin103 For This Useful Post:

    Hirlau (08-23-2014)

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •