Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Real-World Searches

  1. #21
    Senior Member livingontheedge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    656
    Thanked: 111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JBHoren View Post
    If I have to worry about jamokes like you jumping on one word out of a legitimate post, well, I'll certainly think twice about posting anything, anywhere, on SRP.
    Jamoke is one I had not heard before now, its a pretty rude comment to make.
    John

  2. #22
    I'm a social vegan. I avoid meet. JBHoren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Greenacres, FL
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanked: 603

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by livingontheedge View Post
    Jamoke is one I had not heard before now, its a pretty rude comment to make.
    Hey, it's a now-uncommon, pre-WWII term. It's no worse than "palooka". What it doesn't have is the cultural baggage which accompanies more contemporary terms. You need to appreciate that. Think of it as "vintage", and you'll be OK. As for my use of it, well, that's exactly the point I was making, in the sentence you quoted (one word out of a sentence, one sentence out of an entire post). I stand by my original post.

  3. #23
    Orange County N.Y. Suile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    651
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Wow that's insane 5 thousand results to setting the bevel.
    it be impossible to go though all that.

  4. #24
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,429
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JBHoren View Post
    Would it not be more helpful to our users to have the Google Custom Search configured to return the full URL for each post found, rather than referencing an incorrect "page"?
    Well, obviously the google bots use the default pagination. It would be indeed more helpful if Google Custom Search would return the permalinks to the posts. May be you can look into this and find out if it is possible and how to do it? I don't have the time to do everything, so if you think some feature would be useful the best way to make it happen is to do as much of the leg work as you can and leave for me only the part that requires admin powers.

    Figuring out the nature of a problem is a good thing (certainly better than just complaining about a problem), but figuring out the solution is much much better.

  5. #25
    I'm a social vegan. I avoid meet. JBHoren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Greenacres, FL
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanked: 603

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JBHoren View Post
    I just discovered a problem with Google Custom Search results. Specifically, the results are displayed as URLs for the thread(s) in which the search terms are found, referenced to the page of postings on which the particular post is located (see below).

    [Attachment removed]

    Unfortunately, the "Page" is calculated using the SRP default number of posts per/page, and is entirely inaccurate for anyone who has configured their settings for a different number of posts per/page (I, of course, am such a user, with my SRP General Settings configured for 40 posts per/page). What happens is that once I follow the URL, I then need to perform a "Search Thread" for the original search term(s), in order to access the relevant posts.

    Would it not be more helpful to our users to have the Google Custom Search configured to return the full URL for each post found, rather than referencing an incorrect "page"?
    Quote Originally Posted by gugi View Post
    Well, obviously the google bots use the default pagination. It would be indeed more helpful if Google Custom Search would return the permalinks to the posts. May be you can look into this and find out if it is possible and how to do it? I don't have the time to do everything, so if you think some feature would be useful the best way to make it happen is to do as much of the leg work as you can and leave for me only the part that requires admin powers.

    Figuring out the nature of a problem is a good thing (certainly better than just complaining about a problem), but figuring out the solution is much much better.
    Huh... and here I thought I did offer a solution to the problem, one which is implicit in my description of that problem: Change the SRP default posts-per/page to "40". That would fix my issue. I honestly have no idea how many SRP members bother to reconfigure their General Settings to values other than the defaults; what I do know is that most people who change the value for Posts-per/page set it to the maximum possible.

    Thoughts?

  6. #26
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,429
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Right, but your proposal will 'fix' your issue and will break it for almost everybody else because the vast majority of the members indeed use the default setting. Why won't you switch to the default instead?
    It is true that we didn't poll everybody what the default post number should be, but 20 is the number in the default configuration from the software programmers, so I would venture to say that that's the predominant setting in the phase space of all vbulletin forums it's. It just doesn't make sense to make a change which would benefit only a small minority at the expense of the vast majority.

    BTW my pagination is 40post/page as well, and I am also inconvenienced by the way google does things, however as a staff member I am always doing what's best for the forum not what's most convenient for me.

    Now, a solution where the google search uses the permalink is something that makes sense as it is robust against variations in the user preference.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •