Thread: Inappropriate comments

I am reasonably certain also. I just did not understand which side of the fence he was coming from.

FWIW, I think the system here works....I guess that is what I should have said from the start (there is a lot more brevity there)

Originally Posted by Birnando

The standards come from a group of mods trying their very best at applying the rules on this site.
We are a diverse group, and some of our discussions on certain topics can get lenghty

Yes, but the rules don't inform well enough for them to be clear. But I do get it.

Originally Posted by Birnando

Sensorship is indeed a slippery slope, but I have a hard time seeing that what we are discussing falls under that term.
A set of rules on a privately owned net-forum is not sencorship.
I would call that responsible ownership more than anything.
Rules surround us in all parts of our life.
Wether implied or expressed.

Here is the most slippery slope:"A set of rules on a privately owned net-forum is not Censorship" If this is true, then you cannot use the "Publisher's rule" to insulate you from law suits for stuff posted on your website. Once you become the censor, you are no longer publishing which creates larger legal problems. You cannot have it both ways.

Originally Posted by Birnando

Then again, how would you know not to read a certain post due to undesirable content before you have actually read it?

Yes, it does

Are we that sensitive that you have to be forewarned that there may be content you find objectionable?

Originally Posted by unit

I am not sure what you mean here.

Respect!

I was giving an example of just the word "Unit." It was an attempt at making a point and humor.

Originally Posted by Ryan82

I'm reasonably sure that the member was not objecting personally to your screen name, just pointing out that fact that what you might consider unobjectionable might be considered objectionable to others. Who is to decide? The answer is, ultimately, the mods and administrators of SRP.

If a mod or member finds something that could be considered inappropriate we will discuss it as a commitee and we will be the ones to determine the appropriate response. But we also rely on the general membership to report abuses as well, since we can't be everywhere at the same time .

Exactly....thank you!! Another point is that if the Mods have to discuss it, how bad can it actually be? And just so you know, I was a Mod on a very large website for many years. I fully understand how difficult it is to manage an international website.

I appreciate the great job the Mods on this site are doing.

Originally Posted by unit

I am reasonably certain also. I just did not understand which side of the fence he was coming from.

FWIW, I think the system here works....I guess that is what I should have said from the start (there is a lot more brevity there)

I sit on the fence.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

Another point is that if the Mods have to discuss it, how bad can it actually be?

Thanks for the kind words. TBH we have a good group of guys (and ladies) here, so in reality it's not like we are constantly fighting off posts with horrible manners, but sometimes it happens. If it's something borderline it goes to the mod forum and the decision is based on majority opinion. However, if a post is clearly pushing the limits of site decorum, or outright crossing the line of decency, a mod will act unilaterally and deal with it as need be. To be fair, that doesn't happen very often (the majority of cases being spammers), but sometimes a situation calls for it.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

I sit on the fence.

I can appreciate that...and it is one (of many) reason that I do not have my hand raised to be a moderator (I do not want to make the rules...or the calls regarding when/how to enforce them). I moderated a small blog site a few years back...it was small so it was not too bad, but it gave me a HUGE respect for people that moderate places like this.

There is very little black and white. Rules and laws are digital (i.e. 1 or 0, "on" or "off"), but people are analog (i.e. the spectrum of grays between black and white)...in this regard, laws will always require interpretation to apply them as intended, and laws will need to be left vague enough to allow for interpretation to be effective over time. If you think about that...it is pretty scary, but relying on everyone to use taste, and decency is folly.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

Yes, but the rules don't inform well enough for them to be clear. But I do get it.

The rules on this site, to me, is pretty clear to be honest.
Spelling it out even more would make for very boring reading, and it would be quite hard to cover all bases.
Well, that is my personal opinion on that anyway.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

Here is the most slippery slope:"A set of rules on a privately owned net-forum is not Censorship" If this is true, then you cannot use the "Publisher's rule" to insulate you from law suits for stuff posted on your website. Once you become the censor, you are no longer publishing which creates larger legal problems. You cannot have it both ways.

I think you are arguing anarchy here, and I feel pretty sure this site wouldn't be the better for it.
Having a set of rules, and a team that works to uphold them is far from censorship.
A mod on this site is a parttaker of the debates and discussions.
That gives us the opportunity to actually steer discussions away from going south in a hurry, and also be there to guide our users as to our praticing of the set rules.
This, imho, is what gives us all the opportunity to share this hobby, and discuss all other things, on this great site.
It is also what differentiates mods from censors.

In short; if I for a second felt my role here was that of a censor, and not a mod, then I would leave this place in a hurry.
The only way for me to leave even faster, would be if it turned in to your average hate/flame/circular argument site that the net is drowning in.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

Are we that sensitive that you have to be forewarned that there may be content you find objectionable?

I think people can take quite a bit
But you argued that one should read only what one wants.
This is one of the areas where the differences in culture shows the most on an international forum such as this.
And as such, can be quite hard to moderate.

As you know, I'm from a different culture than the majority on here, and I often find myself wondering about the sensitivity of some posts we do get reported to the mods.
It is not hard to adapt to what the Admins and owners of this site wants though.

Originally Posted by Mvcrash

snip..

Another point is that if the Mods have to discuss it, how bad can it actually be? And just so you know, I was a Mod on a very large website for many years. I fully understand how difficult it is to manage an international website.

Snip...

We discuss the borderline cases because we are not censors, we are members here, and we do make mistakes.
To ensure that not someone with a bad day makes bad calls, a consencus between the mods at hand adds to ensure that our decisions are in fact somewhat sane

Originally Posted by earcutter

I don't buy into that notion! I really don't. I have taken social anthropology classes, lived in a few places, and ultimately have come to the conclusion that being a man in a gentlemanly manor is pretty much a universal condition. Morals aside, and how people communicate face to face may be different - but no so much when it comes to typing...

Though I have to admit some cultures are more direct than others - it doesn't mean they are necessarily more Juvenal or prone to being aggressive or "potty mouthed" lol .

AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE! OI OI OI


Mick

Originally Posted by MickR

AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE! OI OI OI


Mick

Yes, it's got to be said. We Australians are juvenile, aggressive and potty mouthed. But you know you love us.