Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default Strop Width, X Pattern and Hot Dog Buns

    What the @#&*, you say?

    Let me esplain...

    There's an issue over whether or not the X pattern in stropping is really necessary. Is it just a means to hit every part of the straight razor at once, or does the X pattern have a more functional purpose?

    Thus, some choose the 3" wide strop. That way they don't need to do the X pattern. Since the width of the 3" gets the whole razor with a simple back-and-forth up-and-down-the-strop stroke all at once, why bother?

    But if that was all there was to stropping, why did the old time strop makers make their strops 2.25" wide?

    Is it the same as the hot dog makers and the hot dog bun bakers? You know, 8 hot dogs in a pack, but only 6 buns to a bag. Why can't they just make them the same?? I know, it's just a clever ploy to get us to buy more bags of buns. Those bastards.

    If the X pattern wasn't necessary, and a 3" wide strop would eliminate it's use, then why the heck didn't those old-timers just make all their strops 3" wide? Were they daft?

    And, did those same guys just stop making strops, and start making hot dog buns instead? Just to piss us off...


    Scott
    Last edited by honedright; 05-17-2008 at 09:00 PM.

  2. #2
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,737
    Thanked: 5016
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    yea and why did they make those tiny barbers hones and narrow regular hones. They are all trying to screw us eh?
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  3. #3
    Member AFDavis11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanked: 1486

    Default

    Yea, more Socratic stuff huh? Damn barbers! What did they know about shaving anyway.

  4. #4
    There is no charge for Awesomeness Jimbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Maleny, Australia
    Posts
    7,977
    Thanked: 1587
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Well, I don't get the bun analogy at all, but that's probably because I'm Australian and we get them in bags of a dozen....

    I'm going to bite the bullet here and play grasshopper.... The way I see it, striations in the bevel are running from tip toward heel like this from X pattern honing (edge on left, spine on right):

    Tip
    /
    /
    /
    Heel

    Unless I've completely misinterpreted X pattern stropping for the last 2 years (entirely possible, I might add ), if a strop were to impart microscopic marks on the edge, they would look like:

    Tip
    \
    \
    \
    Heel

    So to me it looks like X pattern stropping is an "against the grain" process.

    What does this mean? I haven't thought about it enough to know yet (I'm grasshopper, remember).

    But here's a thought. Stick your arm out in front of you and make a backhand tennis swing a few times, keeping your upper arm locked. What motion does your hand make through the air? For me it's an arc in pretty much the same pattern as an X pattern stopping technique. Maybe the old-timers simply knew about the natural ergonomics of a stropping motion on a long-ish piece of leather. Combine that with the fact that, as a general rule, old-timers were parsimonious old buggers, and viola! Narrow strops.

    Case closed.

    Now, I'm hungry. And for some reason I feel like a hot dog...

    James.
    <This signature intentionally left blank>

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    Well, I don't get the bun analogy at all, but that's probably because I'm Australian and we get them in bags of a dozen....

    I'm going to bite the bullet here and play grasshopper.... The way I see it, striations in the bevel are running from tip toward heel like this from X pattern honing (edge on left, spine on right):

    Tip
    /
    /
    /
    Heel

    Unless I've completely misinterpreted X pattern stropping for the last 2 years (entirely possible, I might add ), if a strop were to impart microscopic marks on the edge, they would look like:

    Tip
    \
    \
    \
    Heel

    So to me it looks like X pattern stropping is an "against the grain" process.

    What does this mean? I haven't thought about it enough to know yet (I'm grasshopper, remember).

    But here's a thought. Stick your arm out in front of you and make a backhand tennis swing a few times, keeping your upper arm locked. What motion does your hand make through the air? For me it's an arc in pretty much the same pattern as an X pattern stopping technique. Maybe the old-timers simply knew about the natural ergonomics of a stropping motion on a long-ish piece of leather. Combine that with the fact that, as a general rule, old-timers were parsimonious old buggers, and viola! Narrow strops.

    Case closed.

    Now, I'm hungry. And for some reason I feel like a hot dog...

    James.
    Eureaka!! You've got it!!! (Now what the hell did you just post?)


    Scott

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,292
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    And there are many paddle strops only 1.5 inches wide.

    What does it all mean?

    Who knows? But if we consider the discussion of what stropping actually does, there should be no difference other than the fact that a thinner strop puts a bit more pressure on the edge because the ratio of weight to contact area is decreased, thereby slightly speeding up any edge aligning that needs to be done (if you consider all other variables to be constant).

  7. #7
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    The way I see it, striations in the bevel are running from tip toward heel like this from X pattern honing (edge on left, spine on right):

    Tip
    /
    /
    /
    Heel

    Unless I've completely misinterpreted X pattern stropping for the last 2 years (entirely possible, I might add ), if a strop were to impart microscopic marks on the edge, they would look like:

    Tip
    \
    \
    \
    Heel

    So to me it looks like X pattern stropping is an "against the grain" process.
    Actually James, you kinda lost me at that second part. The way I see it, the stropping (at least the way I'm stropping) goes right along with the "marks" created by X pattern honing, not against them. So we're probably stropping differently from each other.


    Scott

  8. #8
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russel Baldridge View Post
    But if we consider the discussion of what stropping actually does....
    That is the discussion. And it appears that I think it does something different from what others think it does.

    And the fact that what I'm experiencing is different from what many others (with a few exceptions) are experiencing tells me that I could be on to something that may be of value to anyone willing to try it out.


    Scott

  9. #9
    Cheapskate Honer Wildtim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A2 Michigan
    Posts
    2,371
    Thanked: 241

    Default

    I think I see what you are saying.

    If the x in stropping exactly replicates the x in honing thus the action of stropping reinforces the edge built by honing. That way your stropping by working in exactly the same direction might be, rather than just smoothing out the edge, actually restoring the shape imparted to it by the stone so by stropping correctly you can greatly extend the time between trips to the hone.

    Seems simple to me

    Of course I refined my stropping technique by watching your youtube video about a hundred times, that might have something to do with why I get the sense that my razors, like yours, see the hones much more seldom than is average. Though I don't think I have reached your level just yet.

  10. #10
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildtim View Post
    I think I see what you are saying.

    If the x in stropping exactly replicates the x in honing thus the action of stropping reinforces the edge built by honing. That way your stropping by working in exactly the same direction might be, rather than just smoothing out the edge, actually restoring the shape imparted to it by the stone so by stropping correctly you can greatly extend the time between trips to the hone.

    Seems simple to me

    Of course I refined my stropping technique by watching your youtube video about a hundred times, that might have something to do with why I get the sense that my razors, like yours, see the hones much more seldom than is average. Though I don't think I have reached your level just yet.
    Yes Tim, I think you are following my point.


    Scott
    Last edited by honedright; 05-20-2008 at 05:36 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •