Results 1 to 10 of 53

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member mry314's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    106
    Thanked: 17

    Default

    As someone mentioned, there is a very tiny "overlap" between the hole (scales) and the pin. For a 1/16" hole (I use SI, so 1,5785 mm) You need a tolerance class of H7/r6 or H7/s6 for a tight fit. This means there is an overlap of 4...20 microns! This is the ISO standard for pres fits. (25 microns is about 1/1000 of an inch.) The next problem is: Where can You find the special tools to make the pinhole, and the rod to the exact size.

    You need special tools to even measure this measurements.

    So, i'm a little sceptical with this.

    (I work with such little things, so i know, that for example for measuring 10-20 micron difference You need a measuring microscope.)

  2. #2
    Certified madman cako72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    189
    Thanked: 95

    Default

    I don't know, for my part, I want some friction betwen the scales and the blade I.E a tight fitted blade. I belive that would be hard to achieve in this way. Also, a pinned razor can be "thightend" by pinning it a little harder while a pressfit solution, to me, only can be looser, not tighter.

    My 2 cents

  3. #3
    Senior Member ignatz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    298
    Thanked: 312

    Default

    I'm of the same opinion as cako72.

    Although a cryo-shrink fit of a pin (or other metal parts) is a good practice in many machining situations, I do not think it will work well for razors.

    Most scale materials usually have the qualities of being soft, flexible and thin. None of these makes a good, secure 'bedding' for a temperature-augmented force fit.

    It is again worth stressing that when done properly the traditional method of pinning a razor with little washers on either scale only introduces inward compression forces along the axis of the razor pin, but does not place any extra outwards radial force on the scale material itself.

    The traditional pinning method is simple, effective and proven to last for decades if not longer. The only thing that currently makes it seem difficult to most restorers is the lack of a proper and abundant supply of rivet material and washers.

    - Ignatz

  4. #4
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    why do razor scales flex?

  5. #5
    Senior Member khaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanked: 160

    Default

    razor scales flex because the tang is a non-constant width. Slowly open and close and watch. I THINK this might be by design as it sort of acts like a spring to resist movement, making your scales nice and tight.

    The idea btw was not to find an alternate method to pinning, but rather, a way to make flush fit pins.

  6. #6
    Certified madman cako72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    189
    Thanked: 95

    Default

    As Ben.mid has pointed out, it can get a nice clean look.

    I have a way of doing this, take a look at this thread:http://straightrazorpalace.com/galle...-smoke-pc.html

    There I have filed the pins flush with the scale material. But, the scales need to be thick enough to allow at least 1-1.5 mm of tapering to make enough "coning" of the pin. Also, this metod stresses the material a bit, so I doubt that grained materials such as ivory and bone is a good choice. Perhaps some wood spieces can be used, just test away!

  7. #7
    Senior Member khaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanked: 160

    Default

    how does one taper? did you use a countersink bit?

  8. #8
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khaos View Post
    razor scales flex because the tang is a non-constant width. Slowly open and close and watch. I THINK this might be by design as it sort of acts like a spring to resist movement, making your scales nice and tight.

    The idea btw was not to find an alternate method to pinning, but rather, a way to make flush fit pins.
    correct and that does not place shear on the pin

    all my pins have been flush without washers, they could have been flush
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/galle...-one-done.html
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/galle...s-shumate.html

  9. #9
    Senior Member floppyshoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    610
    Thanked: 147

    Default

    IMHO the tightness of your pin will be entirely dependant on the ultimate bearing strength of the wood you're using (which is in the order of 1/10th that of metals and plastics). Essentially you are using a fancy way to drive a nail into the scales without splitting them.

    Also, as was said, the runout on your drill is likely more than the thermal contraction you can get on a 1/16" pin in liquid nitrogen.

    Cheers,
    Dan (B.Eng Building Engineering)

  10. #10
    Senior Member khaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanked: 160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevint View Post
    correct and that does not place shear on the pin

    all my pins have been flush without washers, they could have been flush
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/galle...-one-done.html
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/galle...s-shumate.html
    it does in fact place shear on the pin... the compressive/tensile forces due to flexing are lateral in the scale, which is normal to the pin, which is shearing. Trust me. I am at college for mechanical engineering. I know my mechanics of solids....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •