Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: Optimum blade lenght?
-
01-11-2011, 03:45 AM #1
Optimum blade lenght?
While looking at a badly rust damaged blade I was thinking of how to try to salvage it. To much for a barbers notch, maybe shorten it and add a notch? While my thoughts wandered I eyed others laying in a row. Out came the ruler and they are all 2 3/4" to 3". 100 years or so age difference and they are still relatively the same lenght. Different widths different grinds and I can find info on that stuff but nothing on length. That age difference and still the same length.
There has to be a reason.
Maybe steel was sold in 12" sheets and they could get 4 to a sheet? [I know I am omitting the tang?]
Any thoughts?
Tim
-
01-11-2011, 03:55 AM #2
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 4,562
Thanked: 1263It is interesting and something I've noticed as well. I have no idea as to the reasoning though..I guess if you had the perfectly shaped face you could use the full blade length and get away with 2 passes on your cheeks..lol..I dunno.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Catrentshaving For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-12-2011, 11:43 PM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 2,895
- Blog Entries
- 8
Thanked: 993Not entirely sure either....what I do know is that I'm pretty used to 3". When I pick up some of my 3 1/2 inch blades, I really need to concentrate. I have this Wostie spike point that I love shaving with, but each time I use it I really have to think.
Maybe it was about maneuverability? 3 inches is fairly easy to twist and turn and move around.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Maxi For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-13-2011, 12:45 AM #4
I was thinking the same thing recently. I was wondering if there was a blade out there that was about the same length as a double edge razor blade (about 1.5 inches)? I think that would be much easier to maneuver and would speed the shaving process up.
Makes me wonder if I can shorten an old blade up and give it a try...
-
The Following User Says Thank You to MackofallTrades For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-13-2011, 01:05 AM #5
-
The Following User Says Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-13-2011, 01:14 AM #6
I have seen older razors that are about 3.25 or a bit longer, so there is more of a range. I guess those sizes worked, so no one fixed them? I do find that shorter (western) blades are harder to maneuver, and the same for longer, but it could just be a question of what I'm used to.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to holli4pirating For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-13-2011, 04:14 AM #7
Do you notice a pressure [for lack of a better term] difference with the shorter blade? Longer means more surface area? But then how much does one use the whole length? I am getting to the age of needing glasses so i can understand the depth perception problem of knowing where the end is.
The scales fit in your hand and the blade fits in the scales? I must lead a boring life if this is my question of the day.
Tim
-
01-13-2011, 05:16 AM #8
-
The Following User Says Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:
32t (01-13-2011)
-
01-13-2011, 05:53 AM #9
-
01-13-2011, 11:39 AM #10
Not clear on the "scales fit in your hand etc" question.[/QUOTE]
I meant could the size of the blade be determined by what fits in the scales which could be determined what fits best in your hand?
Tim