Results 1 to 10 of 164
Threaded View
-
10-02-2009, 08:20 PM #11
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,396
Thanked: 346
I'm not saying that at all. The actual thickness of the edge is only part of sharpness. It determines the amount of resistance the blade feels to break the surface of the whisker or skin. But the other part of sharpness is the cutting friction, which determines the amount of resistance the blade feels to separate the whisker or skin apart. You would think this would be minor, but if you've ever used a splitting wedge to break up firewood then you know that this is actually a pretty major factor, and whiskers are even tougher than wood.
The commercial blade manufacturers lower the cutting friction by coating the blades in teflon. We lower the cutting friction by polishing the cutting surfaces with high-grit hones. This changes the percieved sharpness of the razor, and I guess correlates with smoothness as long as the resistance is still high enough. Teflon seems to lower it too much for an unguarded blade, while reasonable levels of polish are just right, and for a straight razor shaver offer him a greater degree of control over the resulting level of "perceived sharpness" since he values the honing time less than the commercial razor manufacturers. But it's not a perfect correlation with smoothness - there are other factors that affect smoothness, such as bevel angle, presence of different size scratch patterns, etc. And I can have a beautifully smooth-shaving razor that is nonetheless too sharp for comfortable daily shaving - I did this for many months when I was playing with newspaper, before I decided that there really was a limit the level of sharpness I preferred.Last edited by mparker762; 10-02-2009 at 08:27 PM.