Results 1 to 10 of 32
-
11-15-2014, 10:19 PM #1
Read It And Weep, Time To Start Hoarding !
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:
Hirlau (11-16-2014)
-
11-16-2014, 02:25 AM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Pequea, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 2,290
Thanked: 375My Wife is going to have a fit!
CHRIS
-
11-16-2014, 02:27 AM #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Maleny, Australia
- Posts
- 7,977
- Blog Entries
- 3
Thanked: 1587I always maintained we hit peak-chocolate back in the mid-90s.
Developed countries like the US rode the chocolate horse to economic growth without concern in the '20s and '30s, never considering it a finite resource or pondering the sustainability of the industry. As W. Wonka, President of the lobbyist organisation Chocolate Starfish said "Chocolate doesn't grow on trees you know."
Now of course emerging super-economies like China and India perhaps justifiably balk when asked to consider their chocolate footprint in the face of their recent spectacular growth. As Chinese minister for chocolate Mil Key Weh stated at the recent Kyoto Summit: "For years, American Capitalism has driven the Hershey Highway. Now China wants a piece of that action!"
It is now an open secret that the CIA (chocolate intelligence agency) has been making repeated incursions into South America with the hope of securing cocoa supply into the future. Political analyst Reece S. Pieces explains: "The CIA cover story about the war on drugs is patently laughable. We all know why they are down there. And the war in Iraq was a chocolate disaster - we all remember the pictures of the chocolate left to burn in the Iraqi Fondue fields."
Yep, we are in trouble alright. Me, I've been stock-piling carob since the '70s.
James.<This signature intentionally left blank>
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jimbo For This Useful Post:
JoeSomebody (11-19-2014), pinklather (11-19-2014), RezDog (11-16-2014), Splashone (11-19-2014)
-
11-18-2014, 11:09 AM #4
The US has known this for a long time, which is probably why they switched actual chocolate with a low quality subsitute.
In fact, to call American chocolate 'chocolate' at all is a stretch
This comment was brought to you from Belgium, home of the real chocolate experience.
Btw, we could switch the term 'chocolate' in this post for 'beer' or 'waffles' and it would still be accurate
Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
11-18-2014, 11:48 AM #5
-
11-18-2014, 02:16 PM #6
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,307
Thanked: 3227
-
11-18-2014, 02:20 PM #7
-
11-18-2014, 03:04 PM #8
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Pequea, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 2,290
Thanked: 375That's harsh Bruno, real harsh about the beer that is....
CHRIS
-
11-18-2014, 04:42 PM #9
When I read this the other day,,, I went that night & bought 3 more bags of M&M's,,,,,,,,,,,the Best Chocolate in the Hole World,,,,
-
11-18-2014, 04:52 PM #10
When I was a kid and you had flapjacks you used real maple syrup. The two brands that prevailed were Log cabin and Vermont Maid and they both contained around 75% maple syrup or more. Then over time they lowered the maple syrup content until Log Cabin contained 0% and Vermont Maid had 1% (just for laughs I guess). They even changed the name to Pancake Syrup and now probably 99% of Americans wouldn't know true maple Syrup if it bit them in the butt.
Chocolate will always be available if you have the cash and for the masses worse comes to worse there will be some substitute and 20 years later folks won't even be able to spell the word chocolate.No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero