Thread: Justin, pull your trousers up man!

I'm slightly concerned at this - I mean, where will it end? Next thing you know we'll be outlawing plumber's crack and brickie's cleavage. actually....

James.

Actually, has anyone seen Justin lately? I've been a bit scatty on the boards recently, but I don't recall seeing him in a little while.

James.

Originally Posted by majurey

Woh woh wo-ah!

Guys, this was intended to titillate. To raise a chuckle. Let's not go there.

Anyway, Lou's gonna post a picture with his trousers halfway down his ass by way of defusing this situation and returning it to comic status.

Isn't that right, Lou?

(Pretty please?)

...and so, by popular demand......








...and a little 'hard rock' butt...










...and, my personal favorite, a 'rock hard' one!...








-whatever

-Lou


I don't know about the rest of you guys, but after finding these pictures, I think I would vote for 'Selective Enforcement' .

I like the last one

Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT

I like the last one

I would have worried if you hadn't!

-whatever

-Lou

At least this guy was attempting to do the right thing, just looks a bit painful way of doing things.

Cheers
John

Originally Posted by johnmw1

At least this guy was attempting to do the right thing, just looks a bit painful way of doing things.

Cheers
John

r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-p-p-p-p-p-p-p!!!!!!!!

YEEEOOOWWW!!!

Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT

Tax dollars at work, I see. If partially showing boxers is indecent, what should I wear at the beach? Some of these Christian fundamentalists are becoming alarmingly like the Taliban and this is coming from an Orthodox Christian. My pants are pulled all the way up but I don't see why we should be giving kids a hard time and wasting tax dollars better spent on fighting real crime or poverty or fixing up roads.

I must say that this is a very rude assumption, and absolute unneccessary commentary!!

Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT

The basis of the law is in indecent exposure.. Who else would push for making it indecent for you to show a part of your underwear if your body is fully covered? My main beef with this law is that it makes a completely harmless practice illegal under severe pentalties and wastes police resources. Since the Islamic fundamentalists don't have enough of a political muscle to ammend a littering law, who else is left? I know! Those guys who lobbied to make showing a nude person on TV a no-no but buckets of blood perfectly ok.

OK - let's do a comparison:

Taliban - force people to accept their viewpoint or DIE by beheading, torture, flying planes into buildings, blowing people up.

So-called Fundamentalist Christians - work through a democratic process to peacefully change laws.

Yep, I see the similarity.

By the way, why is it liberals and atheists and everyone else can use political muscle and influence to make laws for everyone in the nation to follow and thats OK, but let a Christian do it and we "force our views" on everyone

But, I refuse to let this degrade into another holiday blowout. So I'll keep my mouth shut now.

Originally Posted by Jimbo

Actually, has anyone seen Justin lately? I've been a bit scatty on the boards recently, but I don't recall seeing him in a little while.

James.

I don't recall seeing anythng out of him for about a week or so, but, lately, I've been doing most of my hanging out here in 'Off Topic'.

-whatever

-Lou