Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 7891011121314 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 135
Like Tree503Likes

Thread: Measles

  1. #101
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,130
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tintin View Post
    I don't know anything about the doctor or the claims against him(i have to admit that they make him sound like a crook). I have heard several testimonies from scientists/whistleblowers who's careers were ruined and work discredited by the big Pharma because there research would destroy them. I am a firm believer in the potential evil of people especially when big money is involved. Big pharma doesn't have a perfect track record either (think the opioid crisis).
    I work in big pharma. There is a lot of BS always going round about us burying miraculuous cures, suppressing research etc.
    It is true that we are in it for the money. And that is exactly why you can know those claims to be silly.
    If ANY company would find a cure for cancer, or aids, or something else, they would fight each other to get to the patent office first, and rake in trillions.

    The idea that some person's research would destroy a pharma company is a fairy tale.
    The biggest thing wrong with pharma is that assholes like Skrelli can buy single providers and jack up the price by 600%

    The 'cheap' stuff is where the abuse is. Not the expensive stuff. One of the products we make is a very complex thing to make. It needs to be babysat through up to 2 months in bioreactors needing constant attention. It requires a half billion dollar plant, several hundred employees, tens of millions of $ in upkeep, ... for not even 2500 patients worldwide. It took also close to a decade from breaking ground to regulatory approval. It should be obvious why a treatment is around 100K per person per year.

    Companies like where I work for make a sport out of buying promising startups and getting their product to market. They LOVE small startups who make promising new products. Rather than stomping them out, they rush to be first to buy them out.
    JBHoren, Geezer, 32t and 7 others like this.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bruno For This Useful Post:

    32t (12-19-2019), rolodave (12-19-2019), Speedster (12-19-2019)

  3. #102
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,130
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    I should add: we are also often accused that we are more interested in treatments than in cures. That is true in a way. the reason is that there are many diseases where someone dies because their body does not manufacture a certain enzyme that is key to the immune system, of the disposal of toxins at the cellular level.

    What we do at my company is to grow genetically modified cells in bioreactors. We feed them oxygen, nutrients, etc. And they excrete as waste that particular enzyme, which can then be injected in the patients who don't produce it. This process is extremely costly for various reasons. It is complex, needs complex infrastructure to make, and is very tightly regulated. The costs involved are atrocious. The only reason anyone can make these things is that patients die if they don't get it. And it's usually not a nice death either.

    Anyway, we can manufacture the enzymes that are missing, and doctors can inject them in their patients. Those diseases are literally genetic defects. Think of it like a coffeemachine like you have at work, except it is not making coffee because a distracted plumber forgot to hook it up to running water when it was installed. But we are able to splice in a funnel in the machine, and someone needs to top it up with water from a tap.

    But the defect is still there. It's coded in your genes. Now this is where it gets interesting. Up until now, we've been in a situation where we can treat, but not cure. This is NOT because of greed or laziness. It's because rewriting DNA in a living person has not been feasible until now.

    However, techniques have been developed to do just that. The layman's explanation (which is really all I know tbh) is that we tie a good copy of the missing or defective DNA to a tailormade virus. The virus is keyed to the DNA of the patient, and when the patient is infected, the virus will somehow edit the new part in. This is literally a cure. At present, the technique is still far from perfect, but it works.

    Recently there was a high profile case in Belgium that angered me a lot. Basically, a baby was born with an extremely rare disease that would kill it. There is a treatment, but it is horribly expensive, and comes with side effects. There was also a new experimental cure. The cost is 2 million USD for a single treatment. The company who made it got terrible press and was accused of greed etc because they would not lower the price or give it for free. And people's reactions made me made, because they don't want to understand the reality.

    The treatment was 150K per year or so. It should be obvious that the cure was more cost effective. But even aside from that: working with genetically modified treatments is very tightly regulated. They need clinical trials, and time to market is generally 10 or more years. But at least, this regulatory approval covers a single molecule which can be used on all patients. With this new generation of cures, you need to do a large part of all this very expensive work over and over, for every single patient. On top of that, the number of patients were we can do this is even smaller.

    So that 2 million $ cure: it doesn't cost 2 million to make. The company needs a profit too. Especially considering that investors need to put in hundreds of millions of dollars, for a potential profit many years down the line, when it is very uncertain that it will be be a success. So yeah, that 2 million is part profit. But having knowledge of the industry, my colleagues and I discussed it and we are fairly certain that the actual cost in making this single-dose cure is over a million per patient.

    Maybe 10 or 20 years down the line, we get good enough at it as an industry that we can make tailor made cures at a competitive price. But at present many diseases cost 6 figures per year to treat, or 7 figures to cure. Not because we are greedy, but because we are still so limited in what we can do at the genetic engineering level.
    JBHoren, Geezer, 32t and 2 others like this.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bruno For This Useful Post:

    32t (12-19-2019), Geezer (12-19-2019), Razorfeld (12-19-2019), rolodave (12-19-2019)

  5. #103
    Senior Member alex1921's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Woodbury, Minnesota
    Posts
    579
    Thanked: 225

    Default

    Just few observations.
    Gilead created a med to treat HepC. Was it cheap? Nope. Was it cheaper than having people get liver cirrhosis and what ever follows that? Countless hospitalizations, visits to docs, labs and eventually a liver transplant? Yeah much much cheaper. Just a little thought on how to look at prices of meds.

    Second, opioid crisis. I love how the government comes hard on Pharma and docs etc because of it. Well somehow they forget that it was them who said that pain is a vital sign and nobody in the hospital should have any pain. Zero, nada. They started showing patients a smiley to sad face chart with questions to grade their pain form 0-10. If you said anything above 6 or so - boom opiates. So what did they expect, Tylenol would take care of that? Of course everybody was loaded with opiates to keep the patients and the government happy. Why you may ask. Well few years back they spine surgeons were told if their patients report post op pain, medicare wouldn't reimburse for the hospitalization.
    Geezer, rolodave and Speedster like this.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to alex1921 For This Useful Post:

    32t (12-19-2019)

  7. #104
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,130
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Additionally, when it comes to complex drugs, the cost is not only in the molecule itself. This stuff that we make, can be made by a couple of PhD students in a university lab, with minimal cost. In this case, minimal cost is still a university grade lab and high tech equipment. Still, recently there was a news article where this was mentioned. They could make it for a fraction of the price.

    But that literally doesn't mean squat.

    The challenge is not in making this thing. the challenge is in making the EXACT same molecule that was in the FDA filing, in EXACTLY the same process that was in the FDA filing, using ONLY equipment that was fully documented in the FDA filing, following all practices that are required by FDA regulation.

    We have a number of identical bioreactors in our plants. Every single one needed separate FDA approval. Every component we use, every piece of equipment, material, and even the water that we use, ... literally everything that ever comes in contact with the product needs to go through a lengthy FDA filing process.

    Every single change that touches the product causes a re-filing. Every single change that is simply a non impact change needs to go through cumbersome change control processes. Every company that makes drugs needs specific processes to deal with changes, deviations, training, audit trails, etc. That is why we needed over 500 employees to make something for only 2500 patients.

    the challenge is not just in making the molecule. It is in making the molecule, and ONLY that molecule, into an absolutely pure drug. And on top of that we have to implement the 1000s of pages of processes, tests, manufacturing guidelines etc that are mandated by regulation.

    It's like when you made aspirin in science class. Making aspirin is simple, as long as you only care that it is 'mostly aspirin' instead of '100% aspirin'. If you need to guarantee that every batch is 100% pure aspirin and nothing else and implement the entire body of FDA regulation, things get exponentially more difficult in a hurry. On top of that, aspirin is simple because it's a simple molecule that can be made in a trivial process. What we do is feed nutrients to genetically modified cells in a bioreactor to get them to excrete enzymes that we use as a cure.

    That type of manufacturing is even more tightly controlled and difficult to control.
    Geezer, rolodave and STF like this.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bruno For This Useful Post:

    32t (12-19-2019), Geezer (12-19-2019), rolodave (12-19-2019)

  9. #105
    STF
    STF is offline
    Senior Member blabbermouth STF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Kingsville On, Canada
    Posts
    2,435
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alex1921 View Post

    Second, opioid crisis. I love how the government comes hard on Pharma and docs etc because of it. Well somehow they forget that it was them who said that pain is a vital sign and nobody in the hospital should have any pain. Zero, nada. They started showing patients a smiley to sad face chart with questions to grade their pain form 0-10. If you said anything above 6 or so - boom opiates. So what did they expect, Tylenol would take care of that? Of course everybody was loaded with opiates to keep the patients and the government happy. Why you may ask. Well few years back they spine surgeons were told if their patients report post op pain, medicare wouldn't reimburse for the hospitalization.
    Recently I was in a car accident.

    My leg was shattered and I had to have a plate and screws etc.

    The surgeon told me that he wanted to put a needle in my back and make me numb from the waist down (like an epidural).

    I told him that I was in too much pain for silly jokes, forget the needle and that he could wake me up when he was finished.

    I am a real coward and I am not quiet about it, there is no way I was going to be conscious and listen to the hammering and sawing etc.

    Anyway, my point is that I was on morphine after the surgery for a few days. I guess morphine is an opiate. I felt no pain and I am thankful for that.

    I suffered no side effects and I am not addicted.

    I did have several nightmares and got pushed to the nurses station to sleep but I imagine that had more to do with the accident than the Morphine.

    I will say that while I was on the morphine I was given a cognitive test and the result was that i was fantastically stupid. To be honest, I was on the morphine so I didn't really care

    Steve
    Last edited by STF; 12-19-2019 at 04:43 PM.
    JBHoren, Geezer, 32t and 3 others like this.
    - - Steve

    You never realize what you have until it's gone -- Toilet paper is a good example

  10. #106
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,736
    Thanked: 5016
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Pain meds are necessary for operations and many procedures and for many folks who are in serious chronic pain with no other alternatives.Abusing them or taking them when you don't need to is another story.

    I remember seeing a story where a woman said her daughter had a tooth pulled and was on Oxy for 3 days and became addicted. I think that woman doesn't know what her daughter is doing in her life.
    JBHoren, Geezer, 32t and 5 others like this.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  11. #107
    32t
    32t is offline
    Senior Member blabbermouth 32t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    50 miles west of randydance
    Posts
    9,573
    Thanked: 1352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alex1921 View Post
    Just few observations.
    Gilead created a med to treat HepC. Was it cheap? Nope. Was it cheaper than having people get liver cirrhosis and what ever follows that? Countless hospitalizations, visits to docs, labs and eventually a liver transplant? Yeah much much cheaper. Just a little thought on how to look at prices of meds.

    Second, opioid crisis. I love how the government comes hard on Pharma and docs etc because of it. Well somehow they forget that it was them who said that pain is a vital sign and nobody in the hospital should have any pain. Zero, nada. They started showing patients a smiley to sad face chart with questions to grade their pain form 0-10. If you said anything above 6 or so - boom opiates. So what did they expect, Tylenol would take care of that? Of course everybody was loaded with opiates to keep the patients and the government happy. Why you may ask. Well few years back they spine surgeons were told if their patients report post op pain, medicare wouldn't reimburse for the hospitalization.
    I can't "Like" that but thanks.
    Geezer and rolodave like this.

  12. #108
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,736
    Thanked: 5016
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Much of the opioid problem isn't so much folks getting addicted trying to treat pain. Its a criminal thing. Drug distributors sending millions of doses to these little town in the middle of nowhere and crooked doctors and pharmacists and folks looking the other way when they knew something wasn't right.
    BobH likes this.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  13. #109
    I got this . . . Orville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    847
    Thanked: 100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onimaru55 View Post
    You make an incorrect assumption. That the flu vaccine gives you 100% immunity & protects everyone, when in fact this year it was only 29% effective according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/n...-effective-cdc

    You can still make someone sick even if you are vaccinated.
    Did not mean to give the impression I believed the flu vaccine is 100%. what it IS, is better than nothing. If everybody has a 40% immunity chance, then that makes it that much less likely that an "at-risk" person contracts the flu. Given I still have one parent (my Mother-in-Law), and she is diabetic. I get the shot, as does the REST of the family.

  14. #110
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,595
    Thanked: 3747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Orville View Post
    Did not mean to give the impression I believed the flu vaccine is 100%. what it IS, is better than nothing. If everybody has a 40% immunity chance, then that makes it that much less likely that an "at-risk" person contracts the flu. Given I still have one parent (my Mother-in-Law), and she is diabetic. I get the shot, as does the REST of the family.
    My father is 91 & has never had a flu shot. Never gets more than a sniffle in winter either. Now he's in a nursing home full of potentially sick people we may need to reconsider. It might even be mandatory for him to reside there. I guess they'll tell me.

    As a kid I've had measles 2x, Rubella & chicken pox. Haven't had any kind of shots in about 25 years & I don't get the flu or colds certainly not in the last 20 years or so . Used to get sick a lot as a kid.
    I do spend thousands $$$ on supplements & can fall back on my natural therapies training if needed for most things short of setting broken bones.

    We all have different life experiences that colour our beliefs.
    Last edited by onimaru55; 12-20-2019 at 03:45 AM. Reason: typo
    BobH and Steel like this.
    “The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:

    Steel (12-30-2019)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •