Thread: Obama camp furious!

Originally Posted by jockeys

If you are going to despise a candidate, do so for their positions, not their wardrobe

That's the key right there...

I hope you guys will forgive my views, But if you throw away names, race, gender, and religion, political affilitation, and instead look at the candidates for what their past shows, who would you pick?

candidate #1 Lawyer, Has expressed radical views, has worked for known communists, Senior Thesis from college has been hidden from public view at the request of the white house. Involved in multiple scandals and investigations, although never formally charged... Used government status to obtain and purchase property in order to establish residency, and qualify for public office candidate is currently occupying. First elected into office in 2001, but claims to have much more experience. has made promises that are contradictory, and likely impossible.

candidate #2 Lawyer, good charisma, an admitted user of alcohol cocaine and marijuana (in his/her teens)... has made promises that are contradictory, and likely impossible. Pacifist views are well documented, and almost to the point of being extremist. Our enemies will probably have a field day if elected. Has held office longer than candidate #1
known assosiates of questionable view points and influence.

candidate #3 Not a lawyer...history of honorable service to this country, long history of bringing political reform. willing to cross party lines for the greater good. The only candidate with real long term political experience. Not making contradictory promises, not claiming "extra" experience. was involved in one small scandal in the 80s, didn't try to cover it up and was cleared of any wrong doing.


I really did try to dig up dirt for this on candidate #3...

any guess on who they are?

Originally Posted by Mike_ratliff

That's the key right there...

I hope you guys will forgive my views, But if you throw away names, race, gender, and religion, political affilitation, and instead look at the candidates for what their past shows, who would you pick?

candidate #1 Lawyer, Has expressed radical views, has worked for known communists, Senior Thesis from college has been hidden from public view at the request of the white house. Involved in multiple scandals and investigations, although never formally charged... Used government status to obtain and purchase property in order to establish residency, and qualify for public office candidate is currently occupying. First elected into office in 2001, but claims to have much more experience. has made promises that are contradictory, and likely impossible.

candidate #2 Lawyer, good charisma, an admitted user of alcohol cocaine and marijuana (in his/her teens)... has made promises that are contradictory, and likely impossible. Pacifist views are well documented, and almost to the point of being extremist. Our enemies will probably have a field day if elected. Has held office longer than candidate #1
known assosiates of questionable view points and influence.

candidate #3 Not a lawyer...history of honorable service to this country, long history of bringing political reform. willing to cross party lines for the greater good. The only candidate with real long term political experience. Not making contradictory promises, not claiming "extra" experience. was involved in one small scandal in the 80s, didn't try to cover it up and was cleared of any wrong doing.


I really did try to dig up dirt for this on candidate #3...

any guess on who they are?

Candidate three looks pretty good --- I mean he's not a lawyer at least. . Obama needs to be challenged by the media and really debated ---- his media darling status will end hopefully once the primaries are over and then inspiring words won't be enough. I personally don't need a hip and cool president -- give him a slot on MTV or something.

Justin

Nice post mike!

What we have already seen of Obama has me really questioning his judgment, almost as much as I question his positions.

What does it say about a guy when he has an objectionable wife, an extremest pastor and a campaign staff that managed to piss off the Canadian government.

The last president we had with such an annoying wife brought a huge scandal to his office and was impeached by congress. Do we really want to do that again?

Originally Posted by Wildtim

Nice post mike!

What we have already seen of Obama has me really questioning his judgment, almost as much as I question his positions.

What does it say about a guy when he has an objectionable wife, an extremest pastor and a campaign staff that managed to piss off the Canadian government.

The last president we had with such an annoying wife brought a huge scandal to his office and was impeached by congress. Do we really want to do that again?

Really --- hell I'm voting for the guy


Justin

Sorry, I missed the pissed off canada news... enlighten me.

Originally Posted by Nickelking

Sorry, I missed the pissed off canada news... enlighten me.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...t_ready_t.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...amateur_d.html

Ah, I'd forgotten about, thanks.

And for those wanting Obama to condemn his pastor... he did earlier today. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack...h_b_91623.html

Originally Posted by Nickelking

Ah, I'd forgotten about, thanks.

And for those wanting Obama to condemn his pastor... he did earlier today. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack...h_b_91623.html

He may have condemned his pastor, but I will take it with a grain of salt for now as he has been going to that same church with that same pastor for twenty years, and only now, when it might affect his election chances does he condemn him!

Originally Posted by Wildtim

The last president we had with such an annoying wife brought a huge scandal to his office and was impeached by congress. Do we really want to do that again?

Yeah, and now she's running for president

I'm voting for Monica

Originally Posted by Mike_ratliff

Yeah, and now she's running for president

I'm voting for Monica

We need to have a beer together someday!