Results 11 to 20 of 65
Hybrid View
-
06-21-2009, 11:55 AM #1
Speech is free, actions are not. What one person may find patently offensive, others see it as free speech. I can remember the court fight over an artitst who was seeking public funding for a piece with a crucifix in a jar of urine. The artist said his freedom of speech was being denied because he couldn't get public grants for it. Personally I found his art to be tasteless and so offensive to the Christian world as to be horrid. However, as speech I do defend his Constitutional right to that speech. My objection was to the use of public money to support it. I don't ever remembering anything in the Constitution saying that we had to subsidize anyones right to that speech....
-
-
06-21-2009, 08:11 PM #2
Not in the US. Besides the fact that almost any action (even speech) against someone of a different race will be thought of as a race issue, even if it isn't, it'll be made to fit into some other category. I've heard the gamut- disability, age, gender, sexuality, race, creed, family, clique, social standing, vehicle ownership (seriously).
-
06-22-2009, 05:21 AM #3
-
06-22-2009, 02:57 PM #4
haven't had time to listen to the pod cast (still downloading) but I'll go ahead and say I find the idea of hatespeech/hatecrime repugnant and antithetical to a reasonable and just society.
as always south park has paved the way:
judge: (to cartman as he is being sentenced to prison for throwing a rock at a black kid) "I hope you've learned your lesson! The next time you throw a rock at someone you'd better make DAMNED SURE he's the same color as you!"