Thread: Proper use of a CCW firearm

Was the guy actually from the bar? They allude to it, but I never caught whether it was confirmed that the fighting parties had come from the bar.

I think there is a lot missing from this story that could sway people's opinions one way or another. There's no reference to what the fight was over, if it ever got physical, what role the people with weapons had, how it started/ended, timeline of who pulled what and when... too many variables. Why bother for a news channel to even run the story when they can't give this information? It just leaves people with the thought that guns are always bad.

maybe they were fighting over the redhead???

WOOF !!!!!!

Originally Posted by gratewhitehuntr

maybe they were fighting over the redhead???

WOOF !!!!!!

Okay, now we're getting to the bottom of the story! GWH investigates....story at 11....

Originally Posted by Seraphim

For you old-timers out there:

1:11 or so...

Me: Hey, that's a lovely looking bitch you have there.

Hot girl walking dog: Actually it's a male dog.

Me: Excuse me, I was talking to the dog!


Ba-doom!

Originally Posted by Seraphim

Okay, now we're getting to the bottom of the story! GWH investigates....story at 11....

a ginger? ewww, nasty. no souls.

Originally Posted by JohnnyCakeDC

He broke the law when he took his Concealed weapon into a bar in the first place. If in fact that's what happened. The Law in VA, where I'm at, No churches, courts, schools, or places where alcohol is served. I personally don't belive in state CCW permits. The 2nd adment. IS MY CCW PERMIT. glad that guy is alive because of his gun.
ps That red head with the dog had a great ass

This is a classic example of what happens when you assume that the law you are familiar with applies elsewhere, it also assumes facts not in evidence.

There is no claim or any proof that he brought the gun into a bar, they are outside, on the street.

As far as I can tell, this is in Oregon (the television stations call sign begins with a K - West of the Mississippi and it also says Northwest News), I do not know what the CCW law there says about bars.

Originally Posted by Philadelph

I think there is a lot missing from this story that could sway people's opinions one way or another. There's no reference to what the fight was over, if it ever got physical, what role the people with weapons had, how it started/ended, timeline of who pulled what and when... too many variables. Why bother for a news channel to even run the story when they can't give this information? It just leaves people with the thought that guns are always bad.

Which was probably the real agenda in the first place.

Originally Posted by jockeys

varies from state to state. here in TX a bar is defined by certain rules and has to have a state-mandated sign (colloquially, the 51% sign) on the door labeling it as a bar. restaraunt that serves alcohol != a bar in TX. also, no drinking when carrying.

Actually, I believe the resturant must derive > 50% of its revenue from alcohol before it is classed as a bar, hence the 51% sign.