Thread: The eleventh hour?

Originally Posted by holli4pirating

I was curious about the guy's references to the document, so I followed the links in the "more info" section of the Youtube page and looked at the document. Granted, I only gave it a quick look, but I don't see anything about the creation of a new, international government which will rule the world. I searched the document for "government" and read the sections everywhere the word appeared.

Maybe I'm missing something. Has anyone else read the document and found the same implications the speaker has?

I have not. Could you provide a link?

The document is here: (by the way, the url makes me a little suspicuous, but I've not looked around their webpage, so I'm assuming it's legit + grain of salt for the moment)
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/doc...hagen-2009.pdf

If you look at the video on Youtube here:
(I tried to post the url but it keeps just inserting the video. click on the video while it's playing and it'll take you to the actual website)
and click more info, it cites sections of the text that the speaker is referring to.

Holli4pirating,

Do you really think that they would use the term "world government" in the document?? Search for COP instead, for its authorities and powers over participating parties.

Originally Posted by sparq

Holli4pirating,

Do you really think that they would use the term "world government" in the document?? Search for COP instead, for its authorities and powers over participating parties.

I searched for Government because the speaker specifically stated that the word government was used. I'll take another look for COP. Thanks for the suggestion.

The man specifically said "world government" was used in the document. The document linked from "climatechangescam" is obviously heavily (and poorly) edited, so that I won't read it...bias is bias, and this site seems to be a bit heavy handed.

One out and out lie was that "You can't get out"...
From the full text of the convention,

ARTICLE 25:
WITHDRAWAL 1. At any time after three years from the date on which the Convention has entered into force for a Party, that Party may withdraw from the Convention by giving written notification to the Depositary.
2. Any such withdrawal shall take effect upon expiry of one year from the date of receipt by the Depositary of the notification of withdrawal, or on such later date as may be specified in the notification of withdrawal.
3. Any Party that withdraws from the Convention shall be considered as also having withdrawn from any protocol to which it is a Party.

I don't have time to go through the whole thing right now, but I call BS.

Its too late its already happened. Its just waiting until the new owners come to claim this country. better lock and load boys.

Originally Posted by thebigspendur

Its too late its already happened. Its just waiting until the new owners come to claim this country. better lock and load boys.

If you want a real glance at what is happening, try looking at the ACTA treaty. Basically US IP law forced down in everybody's throat, with trade sanctions and more if they don't join followed by trade sanctions if they don't comply, followed by trade sanctions and more if they even think about leaving. Once in place, say goodbye to generics or the safety or your data when you travel. Customs officers are given the right to make a copy of all data transiting through borders and must destroy on the spot anything that is suspected of being counterfeit. Are you traveling with an iPod? Do you have proof of ownership for all songs carried on it with you all the time?

The funny thing is that you can't find a lot of information on ACTA even tho they have been working on the treaty for more than 5 years.