Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 83
  1. #41
    BF4 gamer commiecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanked: 704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    Instead of admitting that any attempt to single out and marginalize a news station is a dangerous precedent that needs to be stopped with a big no-no, the liberals are willing to accept anything from their untouchable leader. Look at all the passion and arguments about how bad that news station is, AS IF THAT MATTERED.

    Imagine if Bush said anything remotely comparable. The scream of the liberals would be deafening.

    This country is ripe for a dictatorship. My 2c.
    I'd say that's what we had under Bush. At least now our President considers the Constitution a bit more than just a goddamned piece of paper.

    Health care for all citizens? SOCIALIST! Nobel Peace Prize? UNDESERVED! Trying to bring the Olympics to Chicago? HAHA! HE LOST! An aide calling opinion journalism "opinion journalism"? OUR DICTATOR IS WAY OUT OF LINE!


  2. #42
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,430
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I don't believe the narrative that JMS posted. Coming from FoxNews's website there is a conflict of interest, right there.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gugi For This Useful Post:

    commiecat (10-19-2009), richmondesi (10-19-2009)

  4. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    844
    Thanked: 155

    Default

    I told you, but you voted for him anyway, now we all have to live it.

  5. #44
    Senior Member blabbermouth ChrisL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,445
    Thanked: 834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    Instead of admitting that any attempt to single out and marginalize a news station is a dangerous precedent that needs to be stopped with a big no-no, the liberals are willing to accept anything from their untouchable leader. Look at all the passion and arguments about how bad that news station is, AS IF THAT MATTERED.

    Imagine if Bush said anything remotely comparable. The scream of the liberals would be deafening.

    This country is ripe for a dictatorship. My 2c.
    Ripe for a dictatorship? Heck, I think the wheels have been in motion with allusions to it for some time and just recently we're seeing visible signs of an actual and real push toward that end.

    On a note more specific to the issue on this thread, does anyone recall any prior administration raising such a public opposition to a media outlet's coverage and interpretation of said administration?

    Chris L
    "Blues fallin' down like hail." Robert Johnson
    "Aw, Pretty Boy, can't you show me nuthin but surrender?" Patti Smith

  6. #45
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gugi View Post
    I don't believe the narrative that JMS posted. Coming from FoxNews's website there is a conflict of interest, right there.
    You call them liars. Are you saying that this a lie, too?

    Observers on both sides of the political aisle questioned the White House's decision to continue waging war on a news organization, saying the move carried significant political risks.

    Democratic strategist Donna Brazile said on CNN: "I don't always agree with the White House. And on this one here I would disagree."

    David Gergen, who has worked for Democratic and Republican presidents, said: "I totally agree with Donna Brazile." Gergen added that White House officials have "gotten themselves into a fight they don't necessarily want to be in. I don't think it's in their best interest."

    "The faster they can get this behind them, the more they can treat Fox like one other organization, the easier they can get back to governing, and then put some people out on Fox," Gergen said on CNN. "I mean, for goodness sakes, you know, you engage in the debate.

  7. #46
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,430
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    You call them liars. Are you saying that this a lie, too?


    Do you believe everything you read on the internet, or you pick and choose, if the later, what do you base your selection on?
    Actually, this would take it way off topic, so feel free to not answer and continue posting on the topic.

  8. #47
    Damn hedgehog Sailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    SW Finland
    Posts
    3,081
    Thanked: 1806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    If I knew of another well known chief propogandist off the top of my head I would have used him/her, and not Goebbels, as that man was a monster.
    Agree with your opinion on Goebbels. That's why i thought that comparing him to Dunn must be a joke.

    On the other quote there was claimed that Dunn statement on some not-so-neutral news channel was actually 'declaring a war'. Such opinion tells me about the lack of the sense of proportion. Things ain't that bad unless you want to see it that way.
    'That is what i do. I drink and i know things'
    -Tyrion Lannister.

  9. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Fox crushes the competition in Cable News. No wonder the Obama Administration is trying to marginalize it.

    http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/19...-16-2009/30899

  10. #49
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

  11. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billyjeff2 View Post
    Did you mean "silence it"?

    If they could I'm sure they would!

    Again, where did I say "Silence" without following with "or marginalize"? Please point it out.

    No quick witted retort, just point it out please.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •