Thread: Someone is giving this administration bad advice.

Originally Posted by commiecat

There's a difference between being critical and lying. You chalk things up to typos when they aren't. That's how Fox seems to work, which is where I found the humor.

I say, "well, those aren't typos" and you completely disregard that and start focusing on the Mao bit. Anita Dunn calls them for what they are, and instead of trying to prove her wrong, Beck say "She supports Mao!" -- as if that has any bearing on whether she's correct or not. I think it's an error to continue the debate publicly, but I also agree with what she said.

Like I said, talking to the Berlin Wall. Bringing it back on topic was to avoid the continued statements regarding Mao.

here it is, from CNN: "Having the spokesman do this, attack Fox, who says that Mao Zedong is one of the most influential figures in her life, was not…a small thing; it's a big thing," Bennett said on CNN. "When she stands up, in a speech to high school kids, says she's deeply influenced by Mao Zedong, that -- I mean, that is crazy."

So should the Administration be attacking a news organization? I'll make it easy for you:


Check one: _______ Yes

_______ No

Optional credit: The reason I answered as I did is as follows: