View Poll Results: Should practicing US physicians be required to speak fluent English?
- Voters
- 55. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
45 81.82% -
No
6 10.91% -
Well, my legs are too long and I straddle the fence.
0 0% -
Expecting people to speak English in an English speaking country is wrong.
3 5.45% -
My English isn't fluent enough to understand and vote in this poll.
1 1.82%
Results 1 to 10 of 53
Threaded View
-
02-10-2010, 02:20 PM #19
That's a bit bold, but OK - maybe "stricter" is a poor choice of words. If tests are already assessing fluency then they don't need to be "stricter," I was only emphasizing that there needs to be some minimum level being tested. How and by whom? Why wouldn't the current test-makers and administrators determine the guidelines and create testing by whatever standards are in place? The only thing that would change is adding questions or components specifically for fluency in English, perhaps as an oral exam or interview, and leave the remaining tests untouched. (The tone sorta implies that you expect my answer to be a little loopy... Just sayin'.)
This is exactly my point: While foreign-language-speaking doctors may be able to speak English in strict medical terms, we are taking for granted the requirement that medical knowledge needs to be reworded for laypersons during consultations. Sure, it's tough even for fluent English speaking doctors to translate medical jargon for patients. This only reenforces the point. How tough will it be for non-fluent English speakers?