Thread: Health Care Reform; States suing as unconstitutional

Originally Posted by hardblues

You know, for the sake of civility, the best method for presenting your thought is to support them with facts...not attempt to belittle or negatively label someone with an opposing view...the implication about maturity...not very convincing or sound! If you have a point, prove it with facts.

I've quoted facts of those with employment insurance, the cost of health care, the compaitive lifespans, the expenditures on uninsured ER visits, the support for the health care plan as it stands, the employment rates, medical law... I've got facts coming out my ears.

What facts have you presented?

You're right, the implication about maturity isn't sound. Why was it made?

All:

This thread has been closed pending moderating team discussion, for the following reason:

SRP holds that debate be gentlemanly (or lady-like) and not digress into personal insults. This thread had not only gone far off topic, but become a logical cesspool.

There have not been citations for 'facts' given, and open insinuations about the character of SRP members have been made unsubstantiated.

Gentlemanly debate certainly includes the use of cited facts, not hearsay and manufactured numbers, as well as the proper and not cudgel-like application of logic and its fallacies.



Thank you for your understanding, please have a cup of tea, a smoke, or a few deep breaths as you thoughtfully reexamine your actions in this thread.