Thread: This is Lame! More Neutering of the American Male!

Politicians want to control the people that put them in office. What better way to control people than outlaw the things they like to do?

His c4 super pac can forward it on anon

Originally Posted by nun2sharp

Should we run Lee on his own ticket? What about the campaign contribution check and the fat manila envelope stuffed with "soft money" I have already sent to Ivan?

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

The first thing you have to do is get that Fluoride out of the water. Secret scientific tests have conclusively shown it's turns men into girly men and makes women more aggressive. It also turns you into an automaton easily subject to suggestion.

This message was sent in error


Sent from my PGA2011 using Strikeaball

I'm guessing another 4 hrs until this thread is closed for Mod review.

I believe a few things:
1. Less people use tobacco in any form than did 50 years ago.
2. Children that grow up in households in which one or both parents use tobacco are exponentially more likely to try and become addicted to tobacco.
3. Baseball players chewing or not chewing have very little or nothing to do with children deciding to chew.
4. Less government=better government.

Sent from the Great Future Bankrupted Peoples' Republic of Illinois.

Originally Posted by paco664

just more miscellaneous B.S from the party of "we know whats best for you"......

You're saing that like the republicans don't try to decide what is best for you

To me, they look identical. They just pick different issues to fight over.

Originally Posted by medicevans

I'm guessing another 4 hrs until this thread is closed for Mod review.

I believe a few things:
1. Less people use tobacco in any form than did 50 years ago.
2. Children that grow up in households in which one or both parents use tobacco are exponentially more likely to try and become addicted to tobacco.
3. Baseball players chewing or not chewing have very little or nothing to do with children deciding to chew.
4. Less government=better government.

Sent from the Great Future Bankrupted Peoples' Republic of Illinois.

Why? Do you think that we are a secret chapter of the Democrats?
I think most US staff and senior members vote republican actually.

We did a general poll in 2008 right after the election, and the 'vote' in our US membership was 3 or 4 to 1 in favor of the Republicans. That was an interesting slant. Given the landslide victory for Obama, I would have expected a 1/1 ratio.

We took some guesses about the reason. The most plausible reason I could think of was that if you are a republican, you are likely to be more of a conservative mindset and therefore more likely to have an interest in historical activities. That said, it is hardly a conclusive argument.


EDIT:
Btw, if you should have the idea that we close threads in which conservatives express their opinion, that is certainly not by design. Even though we don't express political bias, there are 4 republicans for every democrat, so if we can assume that threads go out of bounds at random, then there will be more 'republican' threads closed than 'democrat' threads.

Originally Posted by medicevans

I believe a few things:
......

Now, only if you had provided any data that backs up your beliefs, I'd have been interested in your post. Everybody can make declarative statements, which is exactly what makes those pretty much useless for anything but than reinforcing an 'us' vs. 'them' mentality.

That's usually why threads get closed around here - the philosophy of this forum is the exact opposite i.e. to include and be helpful.

BTW, you may want to learn the meaning of the word 'exponentially', you are not using it properly.

You are my borther from a bulgarian mother, but you are wrong sir! A belief does not need to be backed up by facts.

From Dogma:

Originally Posted by ChrisRockDogma

Rufus: He still digs humanity, but it bothers Him to see the shit that gets carried out in His name - wars, bigotry, televangelism. But especially the factioning of all the religions. He said humanity took a good idea and, like always, built a belief structure on it.
Bethany: Having beliefs isn't good?
Rufus: I think it's better to have ideas. You can change an idea. Changing a belief is trickier...

Originally Posted by gugi

Now, only if you had provided any data that backs up your beliefs, I'd have been interested in your post. Everybody can make declarative statements, which is exactly what makes those pretty much useless for anything but than reinforcing an 'us' vs. 'them' mentality.

That's usually why threads get closed around here - the philosophy of this forum is the exact opposite i.e. to include and be helpful.

BTW, you may want to learn the meaning of the word 'exponentially', you are not using it properly.

Originally Posted by Slartibartfast

You are my borther from a bulgarian mother, but you are wrong sir! A belief does not need to be backed up by facts.

That's just because you're lacking a good training.
I stare my beliefs on a regular basis to line up with 37 facts each. Yes, 37, aka 36+1 is very significant