Page 1 of 17 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 165
Like Tree136Likes

Thread: This burns my bacon! More nanny state bureaucratic nonesense.

  1. #1
    Senior Member RayCover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Festus, MO
    Posts
    377
    Thanked: 113

    Default This burns my bacon! More nanny state bureaucratic nonesense.

    The nanny state bureaucrats have way overstepped their bounds now. To tell a parent what they can and can't pack in their kids lunch goes way too far. I read this article and was just totally disgusted at the arrogance of these people.

    To top it off the kid's turkey and cheese sandwich was taken and replaced by deep fried chicken parts nuggets in the name of better nutrition. What short bus did they pull this retard nutritionist off of anyway?

    Preschooler's Homemade Lunch Replaced With Nuggets | Fox News

    If you read between the lines here you can see one more place where the public education system is undermining the authority of parents in order to indoctrinate kids by making the kids think mom and dad don't know what they are doing. This kind of nonsense is exactly why my two went to private school in their elementary years.

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to RayCover For This Useful Post:

    Grizzley1 (02-16-2012), heelerau (02-17-2012), Hirlau (02-15-2012), hoglahoo (02-15-2012), JohnnyCakeDC (02-15-2012), Loewenherz (02-28-2012), MickR (02-16-2012), ReardenSteel (02-15-2012)

  3. #2
    Senior Member Galopede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Gloucestershire, UK
    Posts
    340
    Thanked: 59

    Default

    Very strange! I could see a point if they replaced the chips/crisps with something a little more healthy but to replace the sandwich with fat filled mechanically recovered fried chicken sludge is amazing! Presume they left the chips as there is plenty of fat in them!

    Gareth
    milehiscott likes this.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Galopede For This Useful Post:

    hoglahoo (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012)

  5. #3
    Sharp as a spoon. ReardenSteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nowhere in particular
    Posts
    2,409
    Thanked: 472

    Default

    The morning radio program I listen to was also talking about this story. It is absurd is about all I can say. It sounded like the parents packed the child a pretty well balanced meal. Deep fried chicken parts, that HAS to be healthier than a turkey and cheese sandwich.
    Why doesn't the taco truck drive around the neighborhood selling tacos & margaritas???

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ReardenSteel For This Useful Post:

    Grizzley1 (02-16-2012), hoglahoo (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012)

  7. #4
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    I agree with you 100%. The outrage in NC also shows that the parents seemed not to know that this was coming, or at least didn't know the extent that the government was willing to go to enforce the new rules.

    The seeming insanity of the replacement food shows the same bungling that is typical of anything the government oversees. Even if the food had been better, she didn't eat it. How much nutrition do you get from food still on the plate?

    Well, get ready, Obamacare will soon give the government the authority to do the same thing to the rest of us. "Eat the way we tell you, live your life the way we tell you or no health care coverage."

    It boggles my mind that this is happening in the US.
    milehiscott likes this.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Crotalus For This Useful Post:

    hoglahoo (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012), Slartibartfast (02-15-2012), WillN (02-16-2012)

  9. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    Home made lunch the kid received from its parents looks healthier to me than the nugget lunch porvided by the moron state nutrionist. I guess the nutrionist was bribed by a hambruger chain to push chicken nuggets.
    milehiscott likes this.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kees For This Useful Post:

    hoglahoo (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012)

  11. #6
    I shave with a spoon on a stick. Slartibartfast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stay away stalker!
    Posts
    4,578
    Thanked: 1262
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Obama personally took a beer out of my hand and forced me to drink wheat grass. I am voting santorum.

    At least he did not make me eat chicken nuggets though.
    Hirlau and alb1981 like this.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Slartibartfast For This Useful Post:

    hoglahoo (02-15-2012)

  13. #7
    This is not my actual head. HNSB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,623
    Thanked: 1371
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Apparently if I post here, hoglahoo will thank it.

    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HNSB For This Useful Post:

    Hirlau (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012), Slartibartfast (02-15-2012)

  15. #8
    Poor Fit
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,562
    Thanked: 1263

    Default

    I dont think you're allowed to say bacon.
    milehiscott and rwebb1683 like this.

  16. #9
    what Dad calls me nun2sharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas city area USA
    Posts
    9,172
    Thanked: 1677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slartibartfast View Post
    Obama personally took a beer out of my hand and forced me to drink wheat grass. I am voting santorum.

    At least he did not make me eat chicken nuggets though.
    For once I would like to thank Obama.
    It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain

  17. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    171
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    It doesn't look like the school nutritionist took the kid's packed lunch away from the kid or forbade her from eating it. She just gave the kid a school lunch as well. The kid chose to just eat three nuggets off the lunch tray and leave her packed lunch untouched. Nobody prevented her from eating her packed lunch. I presume the nutritionist decided to supplement this kid's lunch because it lacked a vegetable portion. If so, she was overzealous because the regulation in question only requires either a vegetable or a fruit portion, and the packed lunch had both a banana and apple juice, which qualify. I also feel like "supplementing" a packed lunch with the entire school lunch tray is a bit of overkill. School nutritionists should have the ability to supplement with individual portions, say a cup of green beans or corn or carrots, instead of giving them the full school lunch as well as the lunch they were packed. If a parent takes the time and effort to pack a lunch, they obviously care about what their kid's eating. If it doesn't meet USDA requirements, then supplement it, but don't offer alternatives to the portions that are packed. This kid didn't need the protein or grain from the chicken nuggets, or the dairy from the school milk, she had that with the turkey sandwich with cheese. She may have needed the corn or beans or whatever vegetable they were serving with the nuggets that day, but not according to the regulation, because she had a banana and apple juice.

    So you have a school worker who went beyond the bounds of what the law requires. The law in question is not designed to, nor does it give school workers the authority to replace a packed lunch. If you pack your kids twinkies and jolt cola for lunch, the school nutritionist can't take them away or make the kid not eat and drink them. All she can do is give the kid some or all of the school lunch, and ask, but not force or require, that it be eaten first. And that's exactly what happened here. The nutritionist gave the kid a school lunch though she had her packed lunch as well, though she wasn't required or instructed to do so according the regulations, since the packed lunch met the nutritional requirements. The kid only ate 3 nuggets off the school lunch tray. She could have eaten her sandwich as well, or her banana, or drank her juice or ate her chips, or ate anything else off the lunch tray, but decided to get the lunch lady in trouble instead.

    This sounds to me like a bad kid that uses food to manipulate the adults in her life. The only way the school nutritionist is gonna think to supplement a packed school lunch like that is if the kid is complaining about it, so to shut the kid up from whining about how dry the turkey sandwich is and how yucky bananas are, she gives her a school lunch. So when she gets home and her mom asks her what she ate and why she didn't eat her packed lunch, she tells her mom that the school lunch lady made her take a school lunch and she only ate three nuggets off it. Instead of getting mad at the kid for not eating her banana or the vegetables on the school lunch tray, the mom gets mad at the school lunch lady for daring to offer more food to her kid than what she packed in her lunch. Sounds like another one of those parents who's kid can do no wrong.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kantian Pragmatist For This Useful Post:

    driver/examiner (02-18-2012), PensacolaTiger (02-17-2012)

Page 1 of 17 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •