Results 1 to 10 of 165
-
02-15-2012, 06:14 PM #1
This burns my bacon! More nanny state bureaucratic nonesense.
The nanny state bureaucrats have way overstepped their bounds now. To tell a parent what they can and can't pack in their kids lunch goes way too far. I read this article and was just totally disgusted at the arrogance of these people.
To top it off the kid's turkey and cheese sandwich was taken and replaced by deep fried chicken parts nuggets in the name of better nutrition. What short bus did they pull this retard nutritionist off of anyway?
Preschooler's Homemade Lunch Replaced With Nuggets | Fox News
If you read between the lines here you can see one more place where the public education system is undermining the authority of parents in order to indoctrinate kids by making the kids think mom and dad don't know what they are doing. This kind of nonsense is exactly why my two went to private school in their elementary years.
-
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to RayCover For This Useful Post:
Grizzley1 (02-16-2012), heelerau (02-17-2012), Hirlau (02-15-2012), hoglahoo (02-15-2012), JohnnyCakeDC (02-15-2012), Loewenherz (02-28-2012), MickR (02-16-2012), ReardenSteel (02-15-2012)
-
02-15-2012, 06:20 PM #2
Very strange! I could see a point if they replaced the chips/crisps with something a little more healthy but to replace the sandwich with fat filled mechanically recovered fried chicken sludge is amazing! Presume they left the chips as there is plenty of fat in them!
Gareth
-
-
02-15-2012, 06:23 PM #3
The morning radio program I listen to was also talking about this story. It is absurd is about all I can say. It sounded like the parents packed the child a pretty well balanced meal. Deep fried chicken parts, that HAS to be healthier than a turkey and cheese sandwich.
Why doesn't the taco truck drive around the neighborhood selling tacos & margaritas???
-
-
02-15-2012, 06:30 PM #4
I agree with you 100%. The outrage in NC also shows that the parents seemed not to know that this was coming, or at least didn't know the extent that the government was willing to go to enforce the new rules.
The seeming insanity of the replacement food shows the same bungling that is typical of anything the government oversees. Even if the food had been better, she didn't eat it. How much nutrition do you get from food still on the plate?
Well, get ready, Obamacare will soon give the government the authority to do the same thing to the rest of us. "Eat the way we tell you, live your life the way we tell you or no health care coverage."
It boggles my mind that this is happening in the US.
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Crotalus For This Useful Post:
hoglahoo (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012), Slartibartfast (02-15-2012), WillN (02-16-2012)
-
02-15-2012, 06:53 PM #5
Home made lunch the kid received from its parents looks healthier to me than the nugget lunch porvided by the moron state nutrionist. I guess the nutrionist was bribed by a hambruger chain to push chicken nuggets.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.
-
-
02-15-2012, 06:54 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Stay away stalker!
- Posts
- 4,578
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 1262Obama personally took a beer out of my hand and forced me to drink wheat grass. I am voting santorum.
At least he did not make me eat chicken nuggets though.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Slartibartfast For This Useful Post:
hoglahoo (02-15-2012)
-
02-15-2012, 07:09 PM #7
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,623
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371Apparently if I post here, hoglahoo will thank it.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HNSB For This Useful Post:
Hirlau (02-15-2012), RayCover (02-15-2012), Slartibartfast (02-15-2012)
-
02-15-2012, 07:19 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 4,562
Thanked: 1263I dont think you're allowed to say bacon.
-
02-15-2012, 08:26 PM #9
-
02-15-2012, 08:49 PM #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Posts
- 171
Thanked: 18It doesn't look like the school nutritionist took the kid's packed lunch away from the kid or forbade her from eating it. She just gave the kid a school lunch as well. The kid chose to just eat three nuggets off the lunch tray and leave her packed lunch untouched. Nobody prevented her from eating her packed lunch. I presume the nutritionist decided to supplement this kid's lunch because it lacked a vegetable portion. If so, she was overzealous because the regulation in question only requires either a vegetable or a fruit portion, and the packed lunch had both a banana and apple juice, which qualify. I also feel like "supplementing" a packed lunch with the entire school lunch tray is a bit of overkill. School nutritionists should have the ability to supplement with individual portions, say a cup of green beans or corn or carrots, instead of giving them the full school lunch as well as the lunch they were packed. If a parent takes the time and effort to pack a lunch, they obviously care about what their kid's eating. If it doesn't meet USDA requirements, then supplement it, but don't offer alternatives to the portions that are packed. This kid didn't need the protein or grain from the chicken nuggets, or the dairy from the school milk, she had that with the turkey sandwich with cheese. She may have needed the corn or beans or whatever vegetable they were serving with the nuggets that day, but not according to the regulation, because she had a banana and apple juice.
So you have a school worker who went beyond the bounds of what the law requires. The law in question is not designed to, nor does it give school workers the authority to replace a packed lunch. If you pack your kids twinkies and jolt cola for lunch, the school nutritionist can't take them away or make the kid not eat and drink them. All she can do is give the kid some or all of the school lunch, and ask, but not force or require, that it be eaten first. And that's exactly what happened here. The nutritionist gave the kid a school lunch though she had her packed lunch as well, though she wasn't required or instructed to do so according the regulations, since the packed lunch met the nutritional requirements. The kid only ate 3 nuggets off the school lunch tray. She could have eaten her sandwich as well, or her banana, or drank her juice or ate her chips, or ate anything else off the lunch tray, but decided to get the lunch lady in trouble instead.
This sounds to me like a bad kid that uses food to manipulate the adults in her life. The only way the school nutritionist is gonna think to supplement a packed school lunch like that is if the kid is complaining about it, so to shut the kid up from whining about how dry the turkey sandwich is and how yucky bananas are, she gives her a school lunch. So when she gets home and her mom asks her what she ate and why she didn't eat her packed lunch, she tells her mom that the school lunch lady made her take a school lunch and she only ate three nuggets off it. Instead of getting mad at the kid for not eating her banana or the vegetables on the school lunch tray, the mom gets mad at the school lunch lady for daring to offer more food to her kid than what she packed in her lunch. Sounds like another one of those parents who's kid can do no wrong.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kantian Pragmatist For This Useful Post:
driver/examiner (02-18-2012), PensacolaTiger (02-17-2012)