Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 63
Like Tree51Likes

Thread: Black Helicopters?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default Black Helicopters?

    I'm sure you have all heard of "black helicopters" supposedly operated in secret by the government.

    What do you think about the military operating drones over your house and spying on your property? The EPA is doing this now and won't explain what they are looking for.

    Where is the outrage? | Fox News

    The City of Arlington Texas acquired a drone for security during the Superbowl and wants to continue to use it at their discretion.

    I don't understand how this is happening without some kind of public outcry. They are predicting tens of thousands being used by all kinds of local governments in the near future.

    Does anyone see this as a problem?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    130
    Thanked: 9

    Default

    They still have and use satellites. I think there will always be something or another. The days of privacy are long gone. I don't see the diff in using a plane to catch speeders and using a drone for security measures, one could aruge that the plane is spying on you on the interstate (i understand thats not your property). With safety comes sacrafice.

  3. #3
    Who's that guy think he is... JoeSomebody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The North Coast, Ohio
    Posts
    2,455
    Thanked: 146

    Default

    Enemy of the State...

  4. #4
    This is not my actual head. HNSB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,624
    Thanked: 1371
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    It's good to see Fox news is finally outraged about a government program that will potentially, without a warrant, violate the privacy of American citizens.
    Though, maybe if they call them anti-terrorist drones, everyone at Fox other than Andrew Napolitano will be in support of it, just like the wiretapping program in '06.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to HNSB For This Useful Post:

    mjsorkin (06-07-2012)

  6. #5
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    You are supposed to be ignored unless there is probable cause. The authorities have to have enough to get a Judge to sign a search warrant.

    This can bypass that whole situation.

    "I don't like what this guy is saying about the Mayor." "Let's check the overheads." "Look, he has 4 chickens in his back yard. That's two more than are allowed. Let's put him in jail.".

    More tyranny.

  7. #6
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    33,177
    Thanked: 5026
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
    You are supposed to be ignored unless there is probable cause. The authorities have to have enough to get a Judge to sign a search warrant.

    This can bypass that whole situation.

    "I don't like what this guy is saying about the Mayor." "Let's check the overheads." "Look, he has 4 chickens in his back yard. That's two more than are allowed. Let's put him in jail.".

    More tyranny.
    Well, I'm with you on this one. The last thing I want is some snoopy Govt man prying into my property and discovering my Marijuana Plantation.

  8. #7
    This is not my actual head. HNSB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,624
    Thanked: 1371
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
    This can bypass that whole situation.
    Just like Bush's wiretapping program.
    Except, then, Fox liked the tyranny.
    nun2sharp likes this.

  9. #8
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HNSB View Post
    Just like Bush's wiretapping program.
    Except, then, Fox liked the tyranny.
    I didn't. I don't like snooping from either side.

    American's have the right to break the law, we always have. We usually cheer for people that get away with victimless crimes.
    American's also have the right to go to jail if caught.

  10. #9
    Senior Member blabbermouth Hirlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    13,530
    Thanked: 3530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
    I'm sure you have all heard of "black helicopters" supposedly operated in secret by the government.

    What do you think about the military operating drones over your house and spying on your property? The EPA is doing this now and won't explain what they are looking for.

    Where is the outrage? | Fox News

    The City of Arlington Texas acquired a drone for security during the Superbowl and wants to continue to use it at their discretion.

    I don't understand how this is happening without some kind of public outcry. They are predicting tens of thousands being used by all kinds of local governments in the near future.

    Does anyone see this as a problem
    ?
    No I don't; I'm worried about my family's health, loosing 40 lbs and whether the Panthers make it to the Stanley Cup before I die.

    If the drones don't wake me up during my afternoon short nap or crap all over my 4-Runner (like the neighborhood ducks do), I could care less.
    MickR likes this.

  11. #10
    Plausibly implausible carlmaloschneider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Mount Torrens, South Australia
    Posts
    5,979
    Thanked: 485

    Default

    Some people might say "if you're doing nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about" but I think we've all got our own ideas about 'wrong'. What is considered a 'wrong' in the community (State) in which I live might not be what I consider a wrong.

    However, 'denying the enemy ground through active patrolling' is a principle I learnt in the army, along with depth of fire and range of fire. In some areas of the world, from what I see on that depressive drug commonly named TV, active patrolling is a required method. Not so much in a loving, caring, peaceful community, maybe; but I bet this is not happening in such a community; if one exists...

    In other words, some people bring it on themselves, and we all have to suffer along with them, but that's just the story of life, and by some people I mean all people...

    But now I'm getting too deep so I'll shut up
    Stranger, if you passing meet me and desire to speak to me, why should you not speak to me? And why should I not speak to you?
    Walt Whitman

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •