Results 121 to 130 of 1102
-
07-22-2012, 05:10 AM #121
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Lakewood, WA
- Posts
- 533
Thanked: 56
-
07-22-2012, 05:10 AM #122
-
07-22-2012, 05:11 AM #123
-
07-22-2012, 05:11 AM #124
-
07-22-2012, 05:12 AM #125
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Lakewood, WA
- Posts
- 533
Thanked: 56
-
07-22-2012, 05:12 AM #126
-
07-22-2012, 05:14 AM #127
-
07-22-2012, 05:15 AM #128
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Republica de Tejas
- Posts
- 2,792
Thanked: 884Post the link.
Read this if you want to.
GUN CONTROL FACT-SHEET (2004) - Gun Owners Of America
-
07-22-2012, 05:15 AM #129
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Lakewood, WA
- Posts
- 533
Thanked: 56
-
07-22-2012, 05:16 AM #130
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Mount Torrens, South Australia
- Posts
- 5,979
Thanked: 485What do you mean? "Perfectly legal because it's private property which the government can't touch". You're saying it's legal for the private company to ban guns (i.e. take away one's right to bear arms on their property), but what do you mean by "which the govt can't touch?"
You can't be suggesting that the government should seek to FORCE land owners to ALLOW anyone who wants to to come on to their land and bring a weapon with them? I was going to jokingly suggest that you should all be up in arms ('scuse the pun) against the theatre for taking away your ability to protect yourself, but I THINK you just said it. Did you?Stranger, if you passing meet me and desire to speak to me, why should you not speak to me? And why should I not speak to you?
Walt Whitman