Results 11 to 20 of 63
Thread: Chick-fil-A
Hybrid View
-
07-26-2012, 10:42 PM #1
-
07-27-2012, 10:10 AM #2
The streets of Chicago must be all cleaned up if this is the Mayors big project?
Never mind the countless homeless in the city, or the crime, get the bad chicken man lol
Chick Fil A is some tasty food, no reason to shut down an establishment (eliminate jobs), just for the owners religious beliefs. Then again, Chicago is know for its upstanding and morally right city government(insert corruption here).
-
07-27-2012, 10:15 AM #3
So I was listening to Boston Radio (AM1030) the other night and the host was talking another this letter.
He summed up the letter from Boston's mayor quite well "We're so tolerant in Boston that we won't tolerate your company for the sole reason that we disagree with you".
I doubt CFA would try this but I would love to see them try to open in Boston, get turned down in the permitting process then take the letter and get the ACLU to represent them due to religious discrimination. It would be epic trolling and the ACLU would hate themselves for having to represent CFA. I would end up with a serious case of the lols
-
-
07-28-2012, 03:10 AM #4
Wouldn't it be awesome for you and a buddy in Boston to go into a Chic-fil-a and pretend to conduct a gay marriage?
-
07-28-2012, 04:24 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,069
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249I liked Santorum's remark to this the best" Why are the people screaming the loudest for tolerance, so intolerant when somebody disagrees with their beliefs" and I really don't like Santorum all that much but the man has a point...
-
07-28-2012, 04:48 AM #6
I agree - but a friend of mine brought up a good point today to me as well. "Since when do CEO's expose their beliefs? They have code for that. Words like we embrace family values."
He's got a point. When you are a CEO - you are an "agent" of the company.
Just another thought... I still maintain that government has no place enforcing "individuals" morals, but as an agent of the company I have to admit I am a bit torn.
EDIT - the government enforces morals every day... sorry dumb thing to say. I don't think the gov has any place telling someone what to believe.Last edited by earcutter; 07-28-2012 at 04:50 AM.
David
-
07-28-2012, 05:06 AM #7
And his very public ant-gay stance has been really good for the company's profits. However as we all know the society has been evolving, so another generation or two and I bet we won't be hearing much of the same rhetoric.
Sexual orientation is not a protected class, but I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes.
-
07-28-2012, 05:14 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,069
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249
-
07-28-2012, 05:12 AM #9
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,069
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249I just don't really have a dog in this fight, Can't really decide which group is showing more hatred, nor do I really care
Sad isn't it
-
07-28-2012, 08:31 PM #10
You're right. We need to look at all the social issues in the US and say "why" is this happening?
Why is One out of every 100 people in the United States is imprisoned. Even though we are 5 percent of the world's population, we have 25 percent of the prisoners in the world. We are number one in the world in the number of people we imprison - we even beat China. Why is our education system behind every other English speaking country in the world? Why is our medical system First only in Cost??? We need to ask ourselves a lot of really hard questions!