Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: Discarded

  1. #11
    32t
    32t is offline
    Senior Member blabbermouth 32t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    50 miles west of randydance
    Posts
    9,575
    Thanked: 1352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by earcutter View Post
    Topeka KS has 11 murders per 100K - Kansas City 21 - St. Louis is batting 40.5..... Phili - 19.6! The "Heartland" is a mess!

    United States cities by crime rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    *EDIT* oh and Toronto is at about 3 per 100K Cangooner.
    Very interesting. For my town the auto theft and the arson are higher than I would have thought.

    To give you an understanding of my point of view here are some rough figures from my personal experience. I have long moved away but still have family there and hear the gossip.

    The town is about 175 people. I make this 500 for easy figuring and the surrounding farms. 2 murders in the last 30 years. By my math [feel free to prove me wrong] I should multiply this by 6.666 to equal 100,000 per year and I get 13.33 per 100,000. Much higher than the inner city where I live at 5.7.

    One of my favorite sayings is that liars figure and figures lie. But it is food for thought.
    Cangooner likes this.

  2. #12
    32t
    32t is offline
    Senior Member blabbermouth 32t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    50 miles west of randydance
    Posts
    9,575
    Thanked: 1352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularjoe View Post
    The difference is, that in a small town...err..village, we all know exactly who we should avoid. :P Heck, we could tell you their names and addresses, the cars they drive, where they work or if they work, AND their next of kin. I like it here...I feel safe so long as that darned Ricky Bobby ain't on the street. If he is..Best go inside.
    .
    If my kids where transplanted in your village they would certainly feel out of place as you would here. I bet if you asked them to answer these questions you would be surprised at how much they are aware of their surroundings. It is all about what you are use to.

  3. #13
    Incidere in dimidium Cangooner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Val des Monts, Quebec
    Posts
    4,065
    Thanked: 1439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 32t View Post
    Very interesting. For my town the auto theft and the arson are higher than I would have thought.

    To give you an understanding of my point of view here are some rough figures from my personal experience. I have long moved away but still have family there and hear the gossip.

    The town is about 175 people. I make this 500 for easy figuring and the surrounding farms. 2 murders in the last 30 years. By my math [feel free to prove me wrong] I should multiply this by 6.666 to equal 100,000 per year and I get 13.33 per 100,000. Much higher than the inner city where I live at 5.7.

    One of my favorite sayings is that liars figure and figures lie. But it is food for thought.
    Very true - statistics can prove to be very wonky if used inappropriately, whether intentionally or unintentionally. And when one has a small sample size, a small blip can cause a major skewing of the numbers. But I do think that statistical crime figures can give an accurate snapshot of the situation in communities of similar size. Particularly in larger centres where the large sample size can help reduce the effect of blips.

    So I think comparing cities like Kansas City (~450,000), St Louis (~320,000), and Winnipeg (~675,000) can be valid because of the sample size. But I'd never consider the same figure for a town like, say, Gananoque (~5,000) because a single act by a single individual could skew the figures so badly.
    32t and earcutter like this.

    It was in original condition, faded red, well-worn, but nice.
    This was and still is my favorite combination; beautiful, original, and worn.
    -Neil Young

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cangooner For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (10-17-2012)

  5. #14
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cangooner View Post
    Very true - statistics can prove to be very wonky if used inappropriately, whether intentionally or unintentionally. And when one has a small sample size, a small blip can cause a major skewing of the numbers. But I do think that statistical crime figures can give an accurate snapshot of the situation in communities of similar size. Particularly in larger centres where the large sample size can help reduce the effect of blips.

    So I think comparing cities like Kansas City (~450,000), St Louis (~320,000), and Winnipeg (~675,000) can be valid because of the sample size. But I'd never consider the same figure for a town like, say, Gananoque (~5,000) because a single act by a single individual could skew the figures so badly.
    That's true enough, but if you average it over a five or ten year period - including the smaller citys gives you a good idea as well.

    Interestingly, violent crimes in a small town is a bigger problem conceptually than in a bigger city. When you live in a city of 3 million it is hard to personalize. When Bobby killed auntie Gertrude... you never forget that lol.
    Last edited by earcutter; 10-17-2012 at 02:32 AM.
    32t, regularjoe and Cangooner like this.
    David

  6. #15
    32t
    32t is offline
    Senior Member blabbermouth 32t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    50 miles west of randydance
    Posts
    9,575
    Thanked: 1352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by earcutter View Post
    That's true enough, but if you average it over a five or ten year period - including the smaller citys gives you a good idea as well.

    Interestingly, violent crimes in a small town is a bigger problem conceptually than in a bigger city. When you live in a city of 3 million it is hard to personalize. When Bobby killed auntie Gertrude... you never forget that lol.
    That is why I used the 30 year example to try to even out the odd blips.

    In a small town it can skew the perception though also if you watch the news from the big city and think 'Holy cow they have 2 murders a week {in the city of 3 million} and it has been 15 years since Bobby killed Aunt Gertrude. I am much safer here!"
    earcutter likes this.

  7. #16
    Senior Member blabbermouth celestino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,498
    Thanked: 173

    Default

    Wow, that is shocking! i can not even imagine that happening.

  8. #17
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,980
    Thanked: 13230
    Blog Entries
    1
    32t and earcutter like this.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (10-18-2012)

  10. #18
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    Holly inundated with data batman lol!! Thanks Glen! Cool site!

    How was the meet in Spokane?
    David

  11. #19
    Member: Swerve Swerve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Elliston, Va.
    Posts
    268
    Thanked: 13

    Default Re: Discarded

    Wow dude thats what kills all rights for responsable gun owners. I have a 2 and 3 year old and they both know not to touch daddys guns even if they aren't loaded (which they never are around my home) and im cleaning them. Simply becsuse all guns should be treated like they're loaded. And I have successfully taught them about firearm safety and what they will do (end life). For all thst its pointed at
    Thank you,
    Swerve

  12. #20
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swerve View Post
    Wow dude thats what kills all rights for responsable gun owners. I have a 2 and 3 year old and they both know not to touch daddys guns even if they aren't loaded (which they never are around my home) and im cleaning them. Simply becsuse all guns should be treated like they're loaded. And I have successfully taught them about firearm safety and what they will do (end life). For all thst its pointed at
    Cool! I don't know when I was thinking about teaching my kids about gun safety... but now seems as good a time as any.
    32t likes this.
    David

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •