Results 21 to 30 of 33
-
08-09-2016, 02:54 AM #21
It is probably .5 mm thick at best, I will do that test with the cleaned out bits.
The stone is out, but it was amber colored and gooey. The box is dated 1912, if authentic I think glue would be fairly easy to come by. Plaster seems like it would be a more vintage method.
-
08-09-2016, 04:40 AM #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Diamond Bar, CA
- Posts
- 6,553
Thanked: 3215I have remove a lot of vintage stones from boxes and only encountered a few that were glued.
Most are “Glued” with slurry and swarf. Try tapping down on the end of the box, one end then the other, lite taps.
If it is a vintage stone, and it is glued, it is probably hide glue and water soluble. Soak it in water for a few minutes.
-
08-09-2016, 04:49 AM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795
-
-
08-09-2016, 02:22 PM #24
So the stone didn't make it out of the box completely? Oh no. I use hot water for stones or a hairdryer for things which can't get wet. Hot water also works really well for the naniwa stones if you want to seperate them from their stands. But keep it mainly on the bottom of the plastic part, not on the synthetic hone.Last edited by Frankenstein; 08-10-2016 at 01:48 AM.
I love the smell of shaving cream in the morning!
-
08-09-2016, 03:23 PM #25
Let me clarify, the stone is 99.999% whole. Just a thin layer of bbw stayed on the bottom of the box. I started out doing cycles in hot water from my tap. There was significant glue on the edges of the hone, with some thin places so I could gauge how well the water was working. After three hours and gallons of water (don't like wasting too much water) there was no progress to the visible glue. So, after I ate and let the oven cool to what felt like 100ish deg F, I popped it in and let it warm up. Let me be extra clear, the heating element was NOT on. I did this because I didn't want too much heat going into the stone and the temp is iffy to control at best. I did 5,10,10 minute intervals to warm up the glue. If I had done an extra 10, I may have saved 100% of the stone. It took 10 minutes to sand off the glue and get the missing areas removed with 320 grit 3M pro paper. Here are some pictures.
Since Utopian reminded me about the acid test and man-made coticules, there'll be a little test with goo-gone on the remainder of the glue in the box and it's effect on the bbw and wood. Probably will be fine.
-
08-09-2016, 03:41 PM #26
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Addison Michigan
- Posts
- 627
Thanked: 115Hey How Was The Cheese & Bacon ??? No Really Nice Job Way To Put The Effort Into It,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Ty
-
08-09-2016, 03:41 PM #27
Well it's a beautiful coti, I look forward to hearing the results.
I love the smell of shaving cream in the morning!
-
08-09-2016, 03:54 PM #28
Thanks guys, I was nervous that it may have been glued because the BBW was gone. It's intriguing because it looks significantly different from my current (1x4ish) bbw and my newer coti. I'm hoping I can make some time before the meet to try it out. Might have to wait until Saturday to EDIT:hone it out.
An interesting note about this stone. If you look reeeaaaaally carefully, you can notice a dark edge to the honing surface of the coti side. Especially in the top right corner of the last photo. When lapping, I noticed it was convexly dished as opposed to the typical concave. I will probably lap this completely flat, but will probably leave some color of the glue on the sides. Cause history reasons and I'm a dork.
Also, what is nearly impossible to photo, is the nearly holographic swirls on the face of the coti. It is hard to see by eye even. Will try day light.Last edited by dinnermint; 08-09-2016 at 06:35 PM.
-
08-09-2016, 04:07 PM #29
When and where did you get that one?
-
08-09-2016, 04:33 PM #30
Came in the mail yesterday from the bay. It seemed reasonably priced and I put a fairly high bid in. I was also fairly intoxicated, as I was on vacation with my friends from high school. No regrets lol.