Results 11 to 20 of 62
Thread: Difference in Carborundum Hones
-
09-11-2010, 12:43 PM #11
Great points!
How about another kink in the Carborundum works? Sometimes the stone changed while the model number remained the same. Here's a few pages from a 1903 Carborundum Company Catalog listing the 201 as a two-grit potter's cutter, separate from the razor hones. However, the 201 becomes a two-grit razor hone later. The sizes are different too. The early 201 potter's cutter is 6x2-1/2 while the later 201 razor hone is 4x1-7/8. Fun stuff. =)
Oh, and it looks like they experimented a little with the numbers too. I've found original advertisements for the 103, 103A, 103C, and 103G razor hones. I wonder what might be all the differences. (Wouldn't it be fun to collect them all?)
Me
-
-
09-11-2010, 12:57 PM #12
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- SE Oklahoma/NE Texas
- Posts
- 7,285
- Blog Entries
- 4
Thanked: 1936I recently obtained one that was in a wooden box. It is quite smooth and HARD. I lapped it a bit to clean it up. On the side it says: "Carborundum Stone No. 124" The 124 is stamped from a different stamp. Stone is quite smooth, but i'm not sure if it's what I would consider finisher smooth, like a barber hone. Keep in mind that I have not put a razor it though, may be a good touch up stone...I just don't know at this time.
Southeastern Oklahoma/Northeastern Texas helper. Please don't hesitate to contact me.
Thank you and God Bless, Scott
-
09-11-2010, 02:13 PM #13
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 263
Thanked: 67Would you post scans of the whole catalog? I'd love to know more about my 200. It's from the Manchester England branch of the company.
-
09-11-2010, 03:04 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795
-
09-11-2010, 08:39 PM #15
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- SE Oklahoma/NE Texas
- Posts
- 7,285
- Blog Entries
- 4
Thanked: 1936Does anyone have anything on the 124?
Southeastern Oklahoma/Northeastern Texas helper. Please don't hesitate to contact me.
Thank you and God Bless, Scott
-
09-11-2010, 09:19 PM #16
-
09-11-2010, 10:47 PM #17
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795I've got a couple of them. In my opinion they are similar to what I described for the 106, in that it is softer and more more porous than the lower 100 series Carbos. If you think the 124 is hard to lap, don't even consider lapping a 101 through 105. It would just make you cry!
I do agree with you that it is a perfectly good barber's hone but not at the level of a finisher or some of the more fine barber's hones.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:
ScottGoodman (09-12-2010)
-
09-12-2010, 12:23 AM #18
As a curiosity, here's one of the "pocket" razor hones made by The Carborundum Company (upper left in photo).
It measures about 1.5" x 3.938" x 0.5". It's so much harder than a Swaty, that it took about 3 times longer to lap (and the surface area is only 60% of the Swatys'). It is finer, IMO, than a Swaty. I use it quite often.
-
09-12-2010, 01:37 AM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795That is a Carborundum 102. It's one of the smallest ones but it remains my favorite. That's probably why I have so many of them.
-
09-12-2010, 06:31 AM #20
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 263
Thanked: 67