Page 41 of 99 FirstFirst ... 313738394041424344455191 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 982
Like Tree2050Likes

Thread: J-Nat club

  1. #401
    I used Nakayamas for my house mainaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    8,664
    Thanked: 2591
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikolay View Post
    I have never seen j-nats of SUITA type marked as AWASE-DO. Never!

    All the SUITA are usually stamped with 「巣板」 or 「本巣板」 or 「白巣板」 or just as 「スイタ」 ( SUITA written by katakana ) and like. But none of them is marked as AWASE-DO.

    For example:

    Attachment 167761

    Some more examples are here: Suita and awasedo
    and here: “V‘R“uฮ(‘ƒ”ย)‚๐”ƒ‚ค‚ศ‚็ ‘ๅH“น‹๏๊–ๅ“X(PROSHOPHOKUTO)
    u”ช–ุ”T“ˆv‘ƒ”ย
    “V‘R“uฮ ŽQlค•iƒy[ƒWFŠ”Žฎ‰๏Žะ X•ฝ

    The very most of AWASE-DO are from the Tomae ( 戸前 ) starta, Aisa or Namito ( 並砥 ), not from SUITA.
    I did not say that Suitas are stamped awasedo, just that from the pic of your stone it looks like suita. It could be nashiji as well but the patterning is more consistent with suita. What does the side look like?
    Stefan

  2. #402
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,110
    Thanked: 458

    Default

    It looks like suita to me, too. Maybe it is a nearby strata, but it looks like suita.

  3. #403
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,597
    Thanked: 3748

    Default

    When it comes to Jnats, I think we all know what something looks like may not be what it actually is.
    Fikira likes this.
    “The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”

  4. #404
    Senior Member Nikolay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    105
    Thanked: 40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mainaman View Post
    I did not say that Suitas are stamped awasedo, just that from the pic of your stone it looks like suita. It could be nashiji as well but the patterning is more consistent with suita. What does the side look like?
    Side and end faces of the stone are covered with varnish.


    Side face:

    Name:  side01-01.jpg
Views: 796
Size:  49.5 KB



    End face:

    Name:  side02-00.jpg
Views: 761
Size:  47.3 KB

    Name:  side02-01w.jpg
Views: 766
Size:  50.6 KB


    magnified fragment of work surface:
    Name:  micro02.jpg
Views: 737
Size:  27.3 KB


    I can take more detailed images of the surface with microscope...
    Last edited by Nikolay; 05-29-2014 at 10:32 AM.

  5. #405
    I used Nakayamas for my house mainaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    8,664
    Thanked: 2591
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikolay View Post
    Side and end faces of the stone are covered with varnish.


    Side face:

    Name:  side01-01.jpg
Views: 796
Size:  49.5 KB



    End face:

    Name:  side02-00.jpg
Views: 761
Size:  47.3 KB

    Name:  side02-01w.jpg
Views: 766
Size:  50.6 KB


    fragment of work surface:
    Name:  micro02.jpg
Views: 737
Size:  27.3 KB


    I can take even more detailed images of the surface with microscope...
    What do you call the small holes on the surface (last picture) ? Aren't they called Su?
    Stefan

  6. #406
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Long Island NY
    Posts
    1,378
    Thanked: 177

    Default

    I bought an unknown mine stone from Takeshi that was possible nakayama iromono, it had su and goma. Im not looking for what I would call it but suita makes sense as it has "su".

  7. #407
    Senior Member Nikolay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    105
    Thanked: 40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bill3152 View Post
    I bought an unknown mine stone from Takeshi that was possible nakayama iromono, it had su and goma. Im not looking for what I would call it but suita makes sense as it has "su".
    Quote Originally Posted by mainaman View Post
    What do you call the small holes on the surface (last picture) ? Aren't they called Su?

    It seems to me that small holes ( AKA Su / 巣 ) are typical for some types of toishi including iromono and number of other Awasedo from Tomae strata.
    Not just for SUITA only.

    Here it is the example of iromono with su: https://www.flickr.com/photos/109151...7637827771915/

    More info on that iromono:
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/hones...-identify.html

    So presence of "Su" is not a distinctive trait of SUITA toishi.

    And the absence of "Su" does not mean that the stone is definetely not SUITA because there are so called Sunashi Suita ( 巣無し巣板 ) stones that are SUITA, but have no Su at all.
    Last edited by Nikolay; 05-29-2014 at 01:40 PM.

  8. #408
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,110
    Thanked: 458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mainaman View Post
    What do you call the small holes on the surface (last picture) ? Aren't they called Su?
    Looks like su to me. I'd be guessing on that stone if I didn't think it was a suita stone, but a fine suita would work fine as a finisher so I don't know why guess anything else? Usually when su-like stuff shows up on asagi stones (that I've seen), less than great things happen.

    I can imagine maybe the stone might be from another strata, because it doesn't look like the classic color suita like shinden (more creamy) or okudo (creamy white), but if it was from another strata, it would be nice if the miner would've identified it or we won't figure it out by looking at it and guessing.

  9. #409
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    97
    Thanked: 13

    Default

    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 704
Size:  39.6 KB
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikolay View Post
    It seems to me that small holes ( AKA Su / 巣 ) are typical for some types of toishi including iromono and number of other Awasedo from Tomae strata.
    Not just for SUITA only.

    Here it is the example of iromono with su: https://www.flickr.com/photos/109151...7637827771915/

    More info on that iromono:
    http://straightrazorpalace.com/hones...-identify.html

    So presence of "Su" is not a distinctive trait of SUITA toishi.

    And the absence of "Su" does not mean that the stone is definetely not SUITA because there are so called Sunashi Suita ( 巣無し巣板 ) stones that are SUITA, but have no Su at all.
    I also have an Iromono and noticed one day under magnification that it had Su. It's a fantastic stone. Dead easy to get excellent edges off of it, but not quite as keen as what I get with Nakayami Asagi I own. Here's a pic of it along with some Nagura and an old arkie.
    mlvallance and RusenBG like this.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Oakeshott For This Useful Post:

    Nikolay (05-30-2014)

  11. #410
    I used Nakayamas for my house mainaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    8,664
    Thanked: 2591
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikolay View Post

    And the absence of "Su" does not mean that the stone is definetely not SUITA because there are so called Sunashi Suita ( 巣無し巣板 ) stones that are SUITA, but have no Su at all.
    I know I have had a few Sunashi Suitas over the years, still have one razor finisher in my stash.
    I have the feeling you are trying to not accept the fact that your stone may be a Suita, like it is a bad thing or something.
    gabrielcr78 likes this.
    Stefan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •