Results 11 to 20 of 21
Thread: Latest flea market Coticule
-
08-13-2012, 12:18 AM #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Posts
- 5,782
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 4249Test it out and let us know how it performs!
Last edited by Martin103; 08-13-2012 at 09:25 AM.
-
08-13-2012, 02:07 AM #12
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Ponca City, Oklahoma
- Posts
- 605
Thanked: 66Edit: off topic reply irrelevant now anyway.
Last edited by sidmind; 08-13-2012 at 03:40 AM.
-
08-13-2012, 02:24 AM #13
I'm scratching my head now. Can anyone explain why a couple of manganese spots on a coticule would make it faster than usual ?
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
08-13-2012, 02:49 AM #14
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Ponca City, Oklahoma
- Posts
- 605
Thanked: 66I was wondering the same thing. I am playing with it and another coti and there is a difference. I would say the spotted one feels more like a thury. Where my normal, coti feels more like an an Arkansas stone, Of course not that dramatic, but that's the ony way I can describe it.
Would that be the description of "faster". ?
-
08-13-2012, 03:16 AM #15
The fact there manganese in the rock means
that's it's finer then other stones.
it's a high class coticule.
-
08-13-2012, 03:32 AM #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Pothole County, PA
- Posts
- 2,258
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 522OZ, me too
_______________________________________________
I was wondering about that "faster" claim also.
Most coticules are known for their garnet content and Salm coticules seem to be known for their manganese content as far as I know. This would be a good thread for pointing out some of the differences in coticules.
Jerry
_____________________________________________.
-
08-13-2012, 03:41 AM #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Posts
- 5,782
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 4249[QUOTE=mrsell63;1006701]_______________________________________________
I was wondering about that "faster" claim also.
Most coticules are known for their garnet content and Salm coticules seem to be known for their manganese content as far as I know. This would be a good thread for pointing out some of the differences in coticules.
Jerry
_____________________________________________.
So some area of the razor would be sharper then others?
-
08-13-2012, 03:58 AM #18
To be more specific how does the presence of manganese influence the size of the garnet crystals.
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
08-13-2012, 04:06 AM #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Pothole County, PA
- Posts
- 2,258
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 522I can't answer Martin or Oz. I only know that I have an 8x3 coti with next to no garnet content and the stone is basically useless. I also have a 6x2 with considerable garnet content and it cuts steel like a bandit.
I also know that the manganese in a Salm coti is softer than the stone itself and the manganese wears away at about the same rate as the rest of the stone. Salms yield a finer edge than a regular coti.
We need clarification by someone who knows Cotis better than the rest of us.
Jerry
-
08-13-2012, 09:09 PM #20