Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
Like Tree42Likes

Thread: These just came in!

  1. #31
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,623
    Thanked: 3749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasShaver View Post
    Ok, can someone elaborate on a "well worn" DMT 325? Im not too thrilled about having to constantly buy sandpaper and lapping on glass. And if the 325 is the starting point for lapping, what would be another good alternative to maintain a flat surface on an already lapped stone?
    If you don't want to use sandpaper or loose grits on glass. A diamond plate is a good option be it DMT or Atoma.
    If you don't hone much, an already flat 4k stone can somewhat maintain an 8k stone.
    The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.

  2. #32
    Senior Member eleblu05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    baltimore md
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    a well worn 325 dmt is a dmt that has been used many of times to lap stones and has become worn (not as aggressive as a new 325 dmt)

  3. #33
    Senior Member PierreR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    252
    Thanked: 154

    Default

    Is ther much concern of grit contamination in hones in general? Say you used a 1000 grit synthetic to lap a finer stone say 8000. I have a DMT XX coarse for lapping some of my stones I use for knives. I know some guys use a flattening stone, sand paper, or another stone to lap, just wondering if you have noticed any odd random coarse scratches from wee bits of embedded particles from the coarser stone/sandpaper/DMT?

    As for HAD, don't really have it bad, but I have wanted a couple natural stones for a while now, and I have no stones for finishing, or razors in general.

    I will play with these for a while, then I will likely pick up a set on Naniwa stones bit by bit, as I figure things out.
    My friends call me Bear.

  4. #34
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,026
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Depends on the Hone in question, but yes cross contamination is a concern, in fact a probability..

    There was a time in the past when using the next lower hone and lapping to crazy high grits was looked at as the correct way to do things, Scrubbing the hones with 3M green pads and running water was also part of the routine to cut down the cross contamination..
    I did this religiously for a few years and 1000's of razors,, Used a 1k to lap the 4 k and a 4k to lap the 8k and the 8k to do the 16k etc: etc:
    I finally stopped after I bought the Shapton 30k and the stupid expensive DGLP they sell to lap it.. It dawned on me the if the Hone with the highest proved grit available was designed to be lapped with a 325 Diamond Grit plate then everything else that was a lower grit would be fine too Haven't looked back since..

    I do use different techniques and higher grit for Oil Stones and Barber Hones...

    Wait a few minutes and somebody will be along to tell you that if you lap to a higher grit the stone performs better Personally I haven't found that to be true with Waterstones
    Last edited by gssixgun; 04-07-2013 at 06:10 AM.
    saitou likes this.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    PierreR (04-07-2013)

  6. #35
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Greenwood, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    1,144
    Thanked: 116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PierreR View Post
    Is ther much concern of grit contamination in hones in general? Say you used a 1000 grit synthetic to lap a finer stone say 8000. I have a DMT XX coarse for lapping some of my stones I use for knives. I know some guys use a flattening stone, sand paper, or another stone to lap, just wondering if you have noticed any odd random coarse scratches from wee bits of embedded particles from the coarser stone/sandpaper/DMT?

    As for HAD, don't really have it bad, but I have wanted a couple natural stones for a while now, and I have no stones for finishing, or razors in general.

    I will play with these for a while, then I will likely pick up a set on Naniwa stones bit by bit, as I figure things out.
    I'd spend the extra buck and go for the Chosera variant of the Nanis when you choose to do so. AFAIK they use a different binding material and that could be the reason I like the feel of these better than the regular superstones.
    Last edited by brooksie967; 04-07-2013 at 02:03 PM.

  7. #36
    Learning something all the time... unit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Missouri
    Posts
    1,690
    Thanked: 247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    The best was the guy claiming 50k Japanese naturals and within 6 months he changed it to 100k.. You can't really call it wrong, but ya sure can smile..
    LOL...to his/her credit, the stones may have actually contained some 100K (or higher) grit...as a matrix for the 8-12K grit

    I am convinced that there is something going on at the edge that is beyond my understanding. Finer is not always better, and not every razor reached the same endpoint with the same methods.

    Steel alloying and treatment is a deep subject that few (me included) seem to really comprehend fully. There seems to be little discussion about these subjects on razor forums, and LOTS of focus on the rocks we drag the across.

    I'm not suggesting that any razors are bad, but perhaps some are better than others and finishing one if these "others" on some uber stone might just be folly.

    I am not sure I am really squeezing everything out of my 8K yet anyway...
    Last edited by unit; 04-07-2013 at 03:23 PM.
    gssixgun likes this.

  8. #37
    Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Gotland, Visby
    Posts
    1,888
    Thanked: 222

    Default

    Maybe he wasn't referring to the size of the grits but the shear number of them, 100.000 gritty particles.
    Hur Svenska stålet biter kom låt oss pröfva på.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •