Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Edge Pics?

  1. #11
    Member rshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    55
    Thanked: 4

    Default High magnification?

    I've done some high mag pictures of a straight razor honed by one of the senior members here. Not sure it's really worth much since they are taken at 100x, 300x, 700x, and 1000x and not very many people can look at a razor with that much detail. If anybody wants to see them I'll be glad to post them. If nobody is interested I'll just save the forum space (the pics are very large).

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to rshaw For This Useful Post:

    BeBerlin (02-12-2009)

  3. #12
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeBerlin View Post
    Ladies, gentlemen, and those yet undecided - we have not one, not two, but three winners! Tim has kindly agreed to have us use his pics; Seraphim, yours will be commandeered, too; sparq, you have just won a free ticket to your very own article in the photography section: Category:Photography - Straight Razor Place Wiki

    Now then. That was easy...

    Joking aside, if no-one volunteers, Lee and I will do the image integration. sparq, if we can be of assistance, just let us know.
    Time is my only enemy. I hope I'll put together something presentable soon. (the hard part would be cleaning my desk)

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to sparq For This Useful Post:

    BeBerlin (02-12-2009)

  5. #13
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloorPizza View Post
    Coming off of your Chinese 12k, there should be no scratch marks visible at 100x magnification (which is all I have). It should look like a mirror.
    All due respect to FP and just my opinion based on my experience. If you want to have your edge polished like a mirror that is fine but it is not necessary for it to be sans scratch marks to be shave ready.

    Just got done looking at a number of razors honed by Lynn, The Topher, Tim Zowada and Mastro Livi ...... on yeah, and last and least by JimmyHAD and they have scratch marks and shave me great. So as in most things with wet shaving YMMV.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  6. #14
    Just one more lap... FloorPizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    775
    Thanked: 142

    Default

    I really do love those high resolution edge pictures, but...

    They don't show what the average honer is going to see. Most of us have up to 100x magnification available. What you see at 100x is *not* what you see (obviously) at ultra high res/mag like the above pictures. Using up to 100x magnification, IMO, a properly honed/finished edge should look like a mirror, with no *visible* scratch marks at all. At least, that's what I shoot for. I don't even bother taking it the shave test unless there are no visible marks at all in the bevel.

  7. #15
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I am limited to 30X so maybe that is a handicap ? I'll tell you this, I received a new razor that was honed by a noted honemiester. Before I shaved with it I took it over to the old B&L binocular microscope to check out the edge.

    When I looked at it I thought that I ought to take it to the Shapton 15 and 30k to clean it up. Then I decided to give the honemiester the benefit of the doubt and shave. It was one of the smoothest slickest shaves I ever got. Gave me a new perspective.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  8. #16
    Just one more lap... FloorPizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    775
    Thanked: 142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyHAD View Post
    I am limited to 30X so maybe that is a handicap ? I'll tell you this, I received a new razor that was honed by a noted honemiester. Before I shaved with it I took it over to the old B&L binocular microscope to check out the edge.

    When I looked at it I thought that I ought to take it to the Shapton 15 and 30k to clean it up. Then I decided to give the honemiester the benefit of the doubt and shave. It was one of the smoothest slickest shaves I ever got. Gave me a new perspective.
    Jimmy, so you could see scratch marks in the edge still?

    Both of my honemeister blades came back with mirror polished bevels. Although it does seem like Old School mentioned that some of his finest edges were produced with Japanese naturals that left the edge looking kinda milky.

  9. #17
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    I always use 200x as a "standard" ,as that is what Tim Zowada used on his site.

    You certainly don't need that high a magnification. As a matter of fact, after a while you can tell how the edge is by simply looking at the glint off of the very edge using a very bright single source light (incandescent is fine, sunlight is even better!), the very edge, that is, not the bevel itself.

  10. #18
    Senior Member singlewedge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    1,568
    Thanked: 203

    Default

    WOW. I need a loop. I was looking at my edge through an 8x swiss army knife magnifier.

    Thanks for the info. I guess my edge is better than I thought.

  11. #19
    Retired Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    3,490
    Thanked: 1903

    Thumbs up Great big kudos to Tim Zowada!

    Following up on my own post, I would like to thank Tim Zowada of Zowada Custom Knives for his kind permission to use his intellectual property in the Wiki. Thank you very much, Tim!

    And here is the result.


  12. #20
    ---
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,230
    Thanked: 278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    Would pictures of this quality + a step-by-step instructions how to take them with entry level DSLRs be good content for a wiki page?
    I for one would like that. I can hook my SLR up to a cheap microscope, but lighting, depth of field and even focusing are difficult. I was using a SureFire torch to light it up but the bulb blew.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •