Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: middleton?

  1. #11
    Antiquary manah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanked: 1783
    Blog Entries
    34

    Default

    One of these days I will crack your sources
    Not need. Ask and I'll reply.
    Alex Ts.

  2. #12
    Senior Member silverloaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    778
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pfries View Post
    One of these days I will crack your sources, thanks manah,
    I really enjoy it when you history gurus shine light on these threads.
    when you do let me know! im in awe, iv had this blade quite awhile, had tried to find info several times before, just getting around to fixing her up and thought id see what others could dig up. I wish I had sooner.
    Manah- my first inkling was 1850-s ish, you wouldn't have any other info that might suggest how long middleton jr might have continued on after papas death? or a better insightful eye to the details and styling that im probably misjudging?
    Silverloaf

  3. #13
    Antiquary manah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanked: 1783
    Blog Entries
    34

    Default

    how long middleton jr might have continued on after papas death?
    Can't say for sure.
    But in 1895 William Middleton & Co. had office/store in London on 4 Edmond's Place, Shepherdess Walk. And this information is enough, because your blade was made before 1891.
    So, the blade was made after 1841 and before 1891.
    My opinion, the blade was made at 1850s, a bit plus or minus.
    silverloaf likes this.
    Alex Ts.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to manah For This Useful Post:

    silverloaf (05-10-2014)

  5. #14
    Senior Member silverloaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    778
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    thank you again, that confirmed my first impression. having documentation to support an impression is FAR better than assumptions.
    Silverloaf

  6. #15
    Huh... Oh here pfries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tri-Cities TN
    Posts
    2,270
    Thanked: 358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverloaf View Post
    having documentation to support an impression is FAR better than assumptions.
    Always Presume never Assume
    silverloaf likes this.
    It is just Whisker Whacking
    Relax and Enjoy!
     



  7. #16
    Senior Member silverloaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    778
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pfries View Post
    Always Presume never Assume
    I couldn't man, I had nothing concrete! but did you notice I didn't state what my assumption was til I saw proofs offered up? that's gotta count for something, eh? haha
    pfries likes this.
    Silverloaf

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to silverloaf For This Useful Post:

    pfries (05-10-2014)

  9. #17
    Senior Member silverloaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    778
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pfries View Post
    Always Presume never Assume
    or perhaps I......surmised it! no one ever surmises anymore, whuzzup wit dat?
    Silverloaf

  10. #18
    Huh... Oh here pfries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tri-Cities TN
    Posts
    2,270
    Thanked: 358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverloaf View Post
    ! no one ever surmises anymore, whuzzup wit dat?
    Not sure why on that but anything I postulate will be pure conjecture!
    silverloaf likes this.
    It is just Whisker Whacking
    Relax and Enjoy!
     



  11. #19
    Senior Member silverloaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    778
    Thanked: 207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pfries View Post
    Not sure why on that but anything I postulate will be pure conjecture!
    indubitably, good sir, indubitably
    pfries likes this.
    Silverloaf

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •