Results 51 to 60 of 92
Thread: Over stropping
-
10-27-2012, 03:23 AM #51
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Mount Torrens, South Australia
- Posts
- 5,979
Thanked: 485So it's being stropped by a deaf person, or maybe a well trained deaf animal (one of the ape family, possibly), or Jimbo's stropping robot that was talked about before...?
[EDIT] unless of course we take the premise that an animal is not 'a body'. And what do be mean by the word 'nobody'? Does the term 'body' always infer a human? Or can it be any entity? Could it be an alien, an alien kind without the sense of hearing? And why would the aliens be stropping for us? Have we enslaved them? Is it a mutual benefit thing? Are we their pets and they strop to excite us; like giving a dog a treat? Hmmm?Last edited by carlmaloschneider; 10-27-2012 at 03:28 AM.
Stranger, if you passing meet me and desire to speak to me, why should you not speak to me? And why should I not speak to you?
Walt Whitman
-
10-27-2012, 03:36 AM #52
-
10-27-2012, 04:12 AM #53
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Frozen Wasteland, eh
- Posts
- 2,806
Thanked: 334
10-27-2012, 04:20 AM
#54
Last edited by Mephisto; 10-27-2012 at 04:42 AM.
From their stillness came their non-action...Doing-nothing was accompanied by the feeling of satisfaction, anxieties and troubles find no place
10-27-2012, 04:29 AM
#55
Over stropping
Whatever our lives might have been, if the time continuum was disrupted, our destinies have changed.
Be the Blade, take a little rest. It won't hurt!
10-27-2012, 04:38 AM
#56
10-27-2012, 04:44 AM
#57
Holy Crap, Schrodinger's Cat
From their stillness came their non-action...Doing-nothing was accompanied by the feeling of satisfaction, anxieties and troubles find no place
10-27-2012, 04:47 AM
#58
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Frozen Wasteland, eh
- Posts
- 2,806
Thanked: 334
No, not quite. The Hawthorne effect predicts that participants who are aware of observation will change their behaviour regardless of their baseline behaviour. H.E. has little to do with the observer per se, but rather in the participant's awareness of being observed.
You are correct in that observing affects the observed.
Last edited by mapleleafalumnus; 10-27-2012 at 04:50 AM.
10-27-2012, 09:33 AM
#59
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,029
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245
If you check back in the Archives you will find some experiments that were done not only on the "Amount" of stropping but even the "Speed" used...
Some of the numbers of laps went way beyond the 200 level IIRC there were some in the 600+ levels, what most people found that was that somewhere between 50-75 laps on leather was the point of diminishing returns..
There were also experiments made in "Dedicated" stropping on linen and leather to bring back an edge pretty interesting outcomes there..
Search a member "Mparker" he did quite a bit of stropping
The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:
mapleleafalumnus (10-27-2012)
10-27-2012, 11:54 AM
#60
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Central Missouri
- Posts
- 1,690
Thanked: 247
Over stropping
Once I deduced the fractal dimensions it verified that all observations are exactly duplicated at every integer value of scale even down to scales so minuscule as to be un-observable even to the aided eye.
So I ask, if something takes place that is both visible to the eye AND not visible to the eye (due to processes under way that are far to fine to visualize), is it possible for observation to affect the outcome?
Last edited by unit; 10-27-2012 at 12:37 PM.