View Poll Results: do you believe in a supreme being?

Voters
173. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    102 58.96%
  • no

    71 41.04%
Page 35 of 66 FirstFirst ... 2531323334353637383945 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 350 of 655
  1. #341
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    852
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    So...just wondering why you think there would be sexual reproduction instead of asexual...it isn't required in single cell organisms after all...? How would this occur by your explanation?


    John P.

  2. #342
    Shaves like a pirate jockeys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    2,423
    Thanked: 590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnP View Post
    So...just wondering why you think there would be sexual reproduction instead of asexual...it isn't required in single cell organisms after all...? How would this occur by your explanation?


    John P.
    I'm not sure I understand your question, could you clarify a bit?

  3. #343
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    852
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jockeys View Post
    I'm not sure I understand your question, could you clarify a bit?
    In other words, why the need for sexual reproduction at all. Single cell organisms reproduce quite fine without it, and presumably if we and everything else evolved from this, the program for this capability is already there.
    So....why the change?
    Why have male and female?

  4. #344
    Shaves like a pirate jockeys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    2,423
    Thanked: 590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnP View Post
    In other words, why the need for sexual reproduction at all. Single cell organisms reproduce quite fine without it, and presumably if we and everything else evolved from this, the program for this capability is already there.
    So....why the change?
    Why have male and female?
    there are several theories about this, most revolving around the idea that genetic drift happens much much faster if you are constantly creating hybrids rather than single-point mutation.

  5. #345
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    852
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    This may be...but it could also equally be argued as the mark of a creator. Otherwise, it is a singularly excellent solution to the problem and has been with us at least as far back as the dinosaurs.

  6. #346
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,292
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnP View Post
    This may be...but it could also equally be argued as the mark of a creator. Otherwise, it is a singularly excellent solution to the problem and has been with us at least as far back as the dinosaurs.
    Right, but one of the two positions is supported by empirically investigable evidence, while the other is speculation.

    Besides, by that analogy, why aren't we all giant insects? Natural selection has no intended end product, so anything that can survive, will. Sexual reproduction wasn't a big enough hindrance to cause extinction, thus it carried on and has shown to be the best method for macroscopic beings to reproduce.

  7. #347
    Vlad the Impaler LX_Emergency's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oss, the Netherlands
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanked: 223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jockeys View Post
    hog-> I would say that the emotion itself is nothing more than a chemical reaction in your head. one that was evolutionally useful at some point, and so the trait was passed on.
    Quote Originally Posted by jockeys View Post
    what's to say "your own free will" isn't also an aggregate set of chemical reactions?
    Quote Originally Posted by jockeys View Post
    unless you define decision making as also a chemical reaction, in which case you make them all the time.

    Ah...so we ARE a product of our inviroment after all? Reminds me of the following song (to me still one of the funniest I've ever heard/seen)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq28qCklEHc

  • #348
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,132
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Deviating from the current line of discussion: how about Old testament vs new testament.
    The God of the old testament is the same as the one of the new testament.
    Someone here saved me the effort of writing down a bunch of examples (actually it was that post which caused me to post just now).

    From the link 'that's not a wise and loving god, that's an evil kid playing The Sims and clicking the disaster buttons just because he's bored'

    The phrasing is on the provocative side, but the point remains valid. Why do christians and catholics believe that their God is good and loving, considering that they accept both the OT and NT.
    To me it seems like praising a mugger for stopping to beat you up.
    Whether or not he changed his ways doesn't really matter because if both the OT and NT are accepted as true, then he did a lot of nasty things and he cannot be that loving and caring omnipotent God.

    I actually read the OT when I was younger. If it were a movie it would be R rated.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  • #349
    Vlad the Impaler LX_Emergency's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oss, the Netherlands
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanked: 223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruno View Post
    Deviating from the current line of discussion: how about Old testament vs new testament.
    The God of the old testament is the same as the one of the new testament.
    Someone here saved me the effort of writing down a bunch of examples (actually it was that post which caused me to post just now).

    From the link 'that's not a wise and loving god, that's an evil kid playing The Sims and clicking the disaster buttons just because he's bored'

    The phrasing is on the provocative side, but the point remains valid. Why do christians and catholics believe that their God is good and loving, considering that they accept both the OT and NT.
    To me it seems like praising a mugger for stopping to beat you up.
    Whether or not he changed his ways doesn't really matter because if both the OT and NT are accepted as true, then he did a lot of nasty things and he cannot be that loving and caring omnipotent God.

    I actually read the OT when I was younger. If it were a movie it would be R rated.
    LOL at that last comment. Soooo true. I've read both from front to back. And I really see no difference between the two.

    Mind you though that often when God seemed most vengefull was after He'd done people a service and they then spit in His face.

    Remember the isrealites that He freed from egypt? People like to remember mostly that He gave a bunch of plagues and let them dwell in the desert for 40 years.....

    In reality He'd just freed them from oppression, and slavery and probably saved their lives and as soon as Moses was out of sight they started making their own god and worshipping to it....I think they deserved a reminder of who He is.

    In all reality....I've not seen anyone yet that couldn't agree with the 10 commandments....and those are almost the core of the OT. (Other than the hundreds of prophesies about the coming Christ)....

    - No killing
    -No stealing
    - No worshipping false Gods (granted that was any God other than Him but still, it makes sense)
    - Respect your parents
    - No working on a sunday and not making anyone else work for you either (every one needs a break at least once a week don't they?)
    - No abusing His name (the God freed His people from opression...I think He deserved some respect don't you?)
    - No lying (no false witness bearing is what it says but that's pretty much what it means.)
    - Don't touch someone else's wife (or husband)
    - no jealousy

    crap...I seem to miss one. Maybe people interpret the no -idol worshipping one as one as well.

    Sorry man. I've heard about people having trouble about the OT....personally I just don't see it. But maybe my image of God is simply different from others.

  • #350
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,132
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Tsk Tsk.
    You forgot the chastity / purity of thought commandment (no 9 on my list). I can name them all them by heart. It's a rhyme I once learned from the old-style catechismus (the book that you had to know by heart in order to renew your communion).
    The spelling is a bit weird, but this was in formal 1950's Dutch. In my days noone used that book anymore, but I read it out of curiosity.

    Bovenal bemin 1 god.
    Zweer niet ijdel, vloek noch spot
    Heilig steeds de dag des here
    Vader en moeder zult gij eren
    doodt niet, geef geen ergernis
    Doe nooit iets wat onkuisheid is
    Vlucht het stelen en bedriegen,
    Ook de achterklap en t' liegen
    Wees steeds kuis in uw gemoed
    En begeer nooit iemand anders' goed.

    You've been out-quizzed by a pagan
    Actually I find that I know more about catholicism than most catholics. Probably because I've taken the time to think about my arguments.
    EDIT: I know you are not a catholic. It was just a general observation.

    As for why I have problems with the Old Testamentual acts: While we can debate about how God was treated, there are several things that don't fit that argument.
    - What about the hundreds of thousands of infants that got killed when He was in a dark mood. They surely didn't deserve it.
    - What did Job ever do wrong?
    Last edited by Bruno; 09-17-2008 at 12:30 PM.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  • Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •