Results 41 to 50 of 90
-
06-28-2008, 06:29 PM #41
Last edited by Pudu; 06-28-2008 at 06:36 PM.
-
06-28-2008, 06:35 PM #42
-
06-28-2008, 06:41 PM #43
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 448
Thanked: 50Oh, please! You're not basing your remarkable statement on that! It was just a name.
Did Hitler or Mussolini nationalize private property? No. Did they exercise national control over the means of production? No. They did none of the things that would qualify them as socialists or communists at all. In fact, they went out of their way to demonize and stamp out communism and socialism whenever they could.
Your assertion is completely absurd.
Mussolini used to say that if there was a synonym for "fascism" it was "corporatism" -- the convergence of corporate interests and national policy. That's why the Nazi/Fascist era was a heyday for corporations like Krupps etc.
It's as though the American government decided to formulate, say, energy policy with input only from oil companies. Oh, wait. That's what happened.
j
-
06-28-2008, 06:48 PM #44
-
06-28-2008, 07:01 PM #45
Their actions are similar to the policies of the American left politicians without the need for the approval of the public! Being dictators they had total dominance as the liberal politicians wish to have over us only they cant quite make the jump because of that pesky constitution!
The conservatives are looking for individual freedom and individual responsibility while the liberals want to give the masses bread and games all the while slowly but surely enslaving us!
Hitler did this by force! Liberal politicians have to do this with political trickery!
As to private property and business, it was private in name only, as the two countries were ruled by dictators! Dictator=no freedom=everything belongs to you until we want it!
-
06-28-2008, 07:04 PM #46
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 448
Thanked: 50
-
06-28-2008, 07:09 PM #47
-
06-28-2008, 07:15 PM #48
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 448
Thanked: 50Come on, man. You can't actually believe what you say about "liberals." Nobody advocates what you attribute to them. Nobody would stand for it. Believe me, it's far easier to justify a statement that conservatives want to take away freedoms than it is that "liberals" do.
Besides that, there really aren't any "liberals." It's just a red herring thrown into an election debate by right wing politicians. I repeat: nobody, but nobody believes what is attributed to liberals.
What's disturbing is the apparent need on the part of right wing people to have a demon to hate, even if they have to create one. That's a problem. Can't right wingers survive without someone to hate?
j
-
06-28-2008, 07:21 PM #49
LOL, I think you got some s'plainin' to do.
So the immense profits that Krupp, IG Farben, Volkswagen, Ford, GM's Opel, and IBM's Dehomag, enjoyed after Hitler came to power all really belonged to the wee Austrian? He got into power with significant help from finaciers and industrialists and he paid them back handsomely.
Oh, and one of the first things he did was abolish labour unions and imprison prominent socialists and communists.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Pudu For This Useful Post:
Nord Jim (06-28-2008)
-
06-28-2008, 07:26 PM #50