Thread: Debunking Dangerously Deceitful Dogma

Originally Posted by LX_Emergency

Simple. A lot of the theories put forward by most scientist can be correct, however this does not explain the how it started. What set things into motion etc. The explanation for taht is theistic evolution.

Thank you, but I'm interested VeeDub65's definition. I'd like to understand how his beliefs do not fit into this category.

Originally Posted by LX_Emergency

You just did and yes it is. There's not call for statements such as this.

I might consider myself chastised, if you were equally discerning when those who have views you sympathise with do similar things.

Originally Posted by jcd

Thank you, but I'm interested VeeDub65's definition. I'd like to understand how his beliefs do not fit into this category.


I might consider myself chastised, if you were equally discerning when those who have views you sympathise with do similar things.

I am. If they did they shouldn't have. I made a general statement about ALL who behave themselves like that earlier.

So now you're calling ME hypocritical. Thanks

Originally Posted by LX_Emergency

I am. Ifthey did they shouldn't have. I made a general statement about ALL who behave themselves like that earlier.

So now you're calling ME hypocritical. Thanks

There is no "if" in this situation. I was not the first to bring up the issue of "pity". I quoted him and replied directly.

You did not make a general statement, you quoted me, and replied to me directly. So yes, I am calling you a hypocrite, and if you insist on thanking me for it, then you're welcome.

Did you read the whole thread? I think you did. Maybe you forgot. It was indeed a general statement. That's ok. I realise I'm not wanted here. I'll step out. Have a nice day.

thread over!

timeouts may follow.