View Poll Results: Please read the first post in the thread, then vote.

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll

  • Statements A and B are both TRUE.

    14 32.56%

  • Statements A and B are both FALSE.

    11 25.58%

  • A is TRUE, B is FALSE.

    3 6.98%

  • B is TRUE, A is FALSE.

    8 18.60%

  • I don't know / Other

    7 16.28%
Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 8141516171819 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 182
  1. 11-02-2009, 04:03 PM #171
    ControlFreak1
    ControlFreak1 is offline
    Troublus Maximus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In your attic, waiting for you to leave
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanked: 431

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by jcd View Post
    Con-to-the-trol-to-the-freako-1....now you're talking my language yo!
    You know it playboy. Luv dem shades. I want U 2 do the pimp walk fo me sum time big dog.

    Play on playuh!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 11-02-2009, 04:09 PM #172
    ControlFreak1
    ControlFreak1 is offline
    Troublus Maximus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In your attic, waiting for you to leave
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanked: 431

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by northpaw View Post
    "Fly" is not a species. They don't have to stop being any kind of fly in order to be a new species. In fact, there are thousands of different species of flies.
    Ya I know, some even say that we don't even know what a species is, how about a kind? One will eventually become a different kind? That better? Then you would say that it's a different kind to the point where the genetic variation is so much that they can not reproduce? But it can in a freak occurance way it can work in the opposite direction to make a 'new' species?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-02-2009, 04:24 PM #173
    jcd
    jcd is offline
    Senior Member jcd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    140
    Thanked: 35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ControlFreak1 View Post
    But it can in a freak occurance way it can work in the opposite direction to make a 'new' species?
    Yo, dawg, are you sure this sentence makes sense? Do you want to write it again?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-02-2009, 04:32 PM #174
    ControlFreak1
    ControlFreak1 is offline
    Troublus Maximus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In your attic, waiting for you to leave
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanked: 431

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by jcd View Post
    Yo, dawg, are you sure this sentence makes sense? Do you want to write it again?
    You are completely out of control!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 11-02-2009, 05:01 PM #175
    Seraphim
    Seraphim is offline
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    As a controlled experiment, it can be clearly seen in this very thread how de-evolutiion occurs.

    A simple poll, and ensuing discussion has clearly devolved from high brow discourse to ghetto slang and back and forth bickering.

    Since claims must always be backed up by YouTube video for validity and peer review, I submit the following documentary by the group DEVO

    YouTube - Devo "Whip It"


    Now then, some of you youngsters out there may not have even been around back when that song/video came out, but by crackey, that is the way music videos were supposed to be made, goldangit! None of this crap they spew out nowadays with gangstas with their pants falling off singing about getting no play, cops, or whatever it is they bellyache about nowadays.

    Hell, MTV doesn't even PLAY music videos anymore! It's all "reality" TV! If that isn't clear evidence for de-evolution, then I don't know what is.

    MTV was created as a music video station, and did not evolve into a higher form, but devolved. Why would living organisms be any different?

    EDIT:
    It can also be seen that "Ma" can whip up a mean bowl of lather at around 2:09 of that vid. Must be old formulation Penhaligons!
    Last edited by Seraphim; 11-02-2009 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 11-02-2009, 05:17 PM #176
    jcd
    jcd is offline
    Senior Member jcd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    140
    Thanked: 35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ControlFreak1 View Post
    You are completely out of control!

    That's no lie, bro.

    But do you think that sentence I quoted makes sense? Do you want to write it again? <---- not rhetorical questions.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 11-04-2009, 02:05 AM #177
    ControlFreak1
    ControlFreak1 is offline
    Troublus Maximus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In your attic, waiting for you to leave
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanked: 431

    Smile

    But, it (in a freak occurence way) works in the opposite direction to make a 'new' species?

    'Whip it good'

    Last edited by ControlFreak1; 11-04-2009 at 04:52 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 11-04-2009, 02:52 AM #178
    janivar123
    janivar123 is offline
    Senior Member janivar123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Porsgrunn Norway
    Posts
    883
    Thanked: 173

    Default

    is this tread changing or something??
    one thing i ponder is evolution seems to observe new breeds of already existing spesies
    the jump to another altogether tho is so far missing a intermediary so its easy to wonder if there was a helping hand in this
    sience cant tell you all the answers did someone or something intervene?

    i like the aproach sience has on this but i must admit so far it dont really make sence
    unless theres a lot of intermediarys that somhow newer turned to fossile
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 11-04-2009, 03:20 AM #179
    janivar123
    janivar123 is offline
    Senior Member janivar123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Porsgrunn Norway
    Posts
    883
    Thanked: 173

    Default

    1 everything was made as it is 2 creatures evolve to adapt and at some point something (devine)makes a change to make a whole new type of being 3 things adapt and evolve to something new by it self just by mutation and enviremental factors

    im usually choosing 3 but after wondering a bit 2 seems more likely 3is not really possible for me cause that would mean nothing at all is random aka none would get an anomoly or decease without it being ment to be

    i thougth i was wrong but now im not so sure
    Last edited by janivar123; 11-04-2009 at 03:24 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 11-05-2009, 03:13 AM #180
    xman
    xman is offline
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    YouTube - 'Why Evolution Is True' by Jerry Coyne, AAI 2009
    • Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Forum Rules