View Poll Results: Please read the first post in the thread, then vote.
- Voters
- 43. You may not vote on this poll
-
Statements A and B are both TRUE.
14 32.56% -
Statements A and B are both FALSE.
11 25.58% -
A is TRUE, B is FALSE.
3 6.98% -
B is TRUE, A is FALSE.
8 18.60% -
I don't know / Other
7 16.28%
Results 1 to 10 of 182
Thread: On Climate Change and Evolution
Hybrid View
-
11-02-2009, 01:50 AM #1
Oh totally. If there were any examples of information getting into the genome, Evolution would be far less embarrassing.
For example, if there were a creature, lets say a bacteria, that learned to do something new and totally impossible, like digest a man-made substance (let's just pick nylon for this example), then that would be a great example of new information. They could even give it an unimaginative name like Nylonase.
But there is just nothing like that at all.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to jcd For This Useful Post:
ControlFreak1 (11-02-2009)
-
11-02-2009, 02:28 AM #2
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In your attic, waiting for you to leave
- Posts
- 1,189
Thanked: 431Yur slippin' J, come on playuh, don't you mean it evolve the ability to digest man made material. And of course they know that it didn't already have this ability because they got some man made material and went back in their time machine and tried to feed it to the poor little bacteria and it couldn't digest it so it died. (Wow! It was punctuated equilibrium, they caused it, it's a conspiracy). So now it has evolved into a new species or whatever? We won't call it a bacteria now, so we have proof of a newly evolved species, not just a variation of an existing organism which is compatible with the ones that haven't developed this ability or characteristic. Wow. That's a nice con I mean deal that they set up.
-
11-02-2009, 02:37 AM #3
That's a great spot there homie!
And of course they know that it didn't already have this ability because they got some man made material and went back in their time machine and tried to feed it to the poor little bacteria and it couldn't digest it so it died.
-
11-02-2009, 02:51 AM #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In your attic, waiting for you to leave
- Posts
- 1,189
Thanked: 431
Ya, I see how that 'proves' that it couldn't already have that ability. You know like, you or I could eat a piece of nylon and digest it, it may not be nutritional but humans a hundred years ago couldn't have done it. I got yo back playboy.
What happin to yo boy X, playuh? He MIA.
shave on shaver
Last edited by ControlFreak1; 11-02-2009 at 02:54 AM.
-
11-02-2009, 03:33 AM #5
-
11-02-2009, 03:39 AM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In your attic, waiting for you to leave
- Posts
- 1,189
Thanked: 431
-
11-02-2009, 04:18 AM #7
This one's special for you, Mark.
YouTube - Does The Evidence Support Evolution?
The Following User Says Thank You to xman For This Useful Post:
JMS (11-02-2009)
11-02-2009, 04:23 AM
#8
My bad on the hate. Stupid ... uh ... the mentally challenged get me mad sometimes, specially when the evidence is a plain as the nose on your face. But I simply must correct you again. I'm not successful.
Hey JCD. Why propose something as ridiculous as bacteria eating nylon anyway. We all know they could never do that, right. Why not show us a real example, huh? Or are you chicken?
11-02-2009, 02:54 AM
#9
11-02-2009, 03:01 AM
#10
well nylon can be broken down so teoreticly it can be digested
a bacteria will adapt to a new enviroment if it dosnt die first
but seems its not really evolution till it comes as something other then a bacteria