View Poll Results: Should practicing US physicians be required to speak fluent English?
- Voters
- 55. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
45 81.82% -
No
6 10.91% -
Well, my legs are too long and I straddle the fence.
0 0% -
Expecting people to speak English in an English speaking country is wrong.
3 5.45% -
My English isn't fluent enough to understand and vote in this poll.
1 1.82%
Results 41 to 50 of 53
-
02-10-2010, 06:52 PM #41
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- St. Paul, MN, USA
- Posts
- 2,401
Thanked: 335We all know that the average american brute is barely mono-lingual. For us to emerge from our restrictive and ugly shells we must become multi-lingual so that we can ably converse with the multi-tude of other world citizens. Then we can all melt together in this great Pangaea pot.
OK, big group hug now
And if I could have understood a word that my health maintenance organization MD of 20+ years ago said about my wrecked knee, maybe I would be limping less now. I'm sure, no - I believe, it was English that was spoken, but it was so heavily accented that it was unintelligible to me.
-
02-10-2010, 08:55 PM #42
Of course they should. That's just common sense. Should they be required to? That's a different question.
Just to play devil's advocate, do you speak Maori?
I don't mean to be combative at all, but simply to point out that there is plenty of grey in this issue.
-
02-11-2010, 12:00 AM #43
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- manchester, tn
- Posts
- 938
Thanked: 259that statement is elitist to say the least. there are many words and phrases that mean vastly different things to people depending on the area of the country they may be from or nuances to that particular persons upbringing and socioeconomic status(I.E. education)
being born, raised and living in a country with a "mother" language does not mean everyone has the same definition of words and phrases within that country.
this should be more proof that being fluent in the language of the country that a doctor resides in, is of utmost importance.Last edited by 59caddy; 02-11-2010 at 04:21 AM.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to 59caddy For This Useful Post:
nun2sharp (02-11-2010)
-
02-11-2010, 06:40 AM #44
Actually it is not at all, unless you are able to demonstrate in what way it is by using Dictionary and Thesaurus - Merriam-Webster Online as the source for your definitions.
The part in red actually means that fluency is an amorphous term, and has no bearing whatsoever on any importance of it.
Come on, logic is logic, just constructing a paragraph doesn't make it an argument.
-
02-11-2010, 06:54 AM #45
^^^
PS Why does the poll offer only one 'yes' option, but two 'no' options and two 'n/a' options?
-
02-11-2010, 07:03 AM #46
Well, why would they do anything beyond what they are currently doing? Because they read your post? In my view you were posting way over your head. You bought a narrative without any supporting evidence to it and then started making claims what needs to be done without even knowing what is currently done.
No, the tone implies that I found your posts up to that point a little 'loopy' (see the previous part of this post). I expected that you will either request that the government begin regulating the requirements for fluency, or have some way to explain how something that according to you the free market forces haven't provided up to now, will somehow be created by these same forces once you realized the need for it.
But instead your solution was 'it should just happen'.
Fortunately, it actually has already happened and this whole thread seems to be nothing more than a straw man.
-
02-11-2010, 01:23 PM #47
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- manchester, tn
- Posts
- 938
Thanked: 259you just proved my point. everyone does not adhere to the set definitions of words per Merriam-Webster. that is what i mean by elitist. just because one has a higher education(which is to be commended) does not mean others do. different areas of the country have different definitions of the same word, regardless of what is proper. thus being fluent in the language and understanding these little nuances would help the doctor to understand any and all questions posed by his patients and also help him convey to the patient what he needs them to understand.
when it comes to ones health there should be no questions left unanswered or misunderstood.
-
02-11-2010, 02:02 PM #48
Tom,
Having worked in the field of Veterinary Medicine for over 30 years, I understand the point you make. You're are correct, Vets don't speak dog, cat, cow, snake, etc. - and they diagnose their patients just fine. I, too, had a Chinese doctor years ago, and he is to this day, the finest Internal Medicine doctor I have ever seen. (I have been a Type 1 diabetic for over 50 years). - and his language skills were not that great.
* This is a great post!
Steve
-
02-11-2010, 02:07 PM #49
I did not read the entire thread but I have his question: Don't they have to take the FLEX or whatever license is required by whom ever requires it? Are they (the tests) given in different languages?
Me nephew is chief resident at a large private metro hospital and I know he speaks engrish.“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
Albert Einstein
-
02-11-2010, 02:16 PM #50
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267Yes the doctors should be able to speak English. English is the most comprehensive language on the globe. Why you may ask? Because English is a language that encompasses all the languages. When the English language needs a word it will steal it if necessary to be exact and concise.
The idea that one should just go out and find a doctor that has the necessary English skills is all well and fine if one has the financial means to do so. What often happens is that the poor and the uneducated get the short end of the stick and end up with doctors that are just not up to a higher standard that most of us demand from our doctors. I live in a community where the unemployment rate has historically been the 20's and that is before the economic climate that we are in now and I can tell you that we end up with some real losers here.
Later,
Richard