Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 70
  1. #31
    Wee Whisker Whacker BingoBango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    760
    Thanked: 177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    Alright!! My beer squeeked in at #10!!
    Nice choice! Although I prefer Bud, I drink MHL when the celebration calls for the "Champagne of Beers"!

  2. #32
    Senior Member northpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    691
    Thanked: 192

    Default

    I'd be curious to see the relationship between news network preference and hours of TV watched per week.

  3. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Thanked: 19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    Don't even get me started on National Propaganda Radio (NPR).
    So Fox News is fair and balanced and NPR is propaganda? Is that what you're saying?

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NYCshaver View Post
    So Fox News is fair and balanced and NPR is propaganda? Is that what you're saying?
    I'm saying that Fox News is the Filet Mignon of cable news networks, while CNN, MSNBC and Headline News are the $1 menu double cheeseburgers.

    National Propaganda Radio is the WIC/food stamps of News. Only listen to what the government wants you to hear. (what a great watch dog of government NPR is. Like they are really going to report on the corruption in the very entity that gives them their money.) How did they cover ACORN? Oh yeah, they wondered why conservatives were attacking this great organization. How did they cover Van Jones? go to NPR web site and look. according to NPR he's a great guy. (their latest one is "The Rightful Return of Van Jones") ARE YOU KIDDING ME????

  5. #35
    Newbie Desdinova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Canada, eh
    Posts
    337
    Thanked: 88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northpaw View Post
    I'd be curious to see the relationship between news network preference and hours of TV watched per week.

    news network viewing increases as total TV hours decreases. Regardless of left or right political view.

  6. #36
    BF4 gamer commiecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanked: 704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    I'm saying that Fox News is the Filet Mignon of cable news networks, while CNN, MSNBC and Headline News are the $1 menu double cheeseburgers.

    National Propaganda Radio is the WIC/food stamps of News. Only listen to what the government wants you to hear. (what a great watch dog of government NPR is. Like they are really going to report on the corruption in the very entity that gives them their money.) How did they cover ACORN? Oh yeah, they wondered why conservatives were attacking this great organization. How did they cover Van Jones? go to NPR web site and look. according to NPR he's a great guy. (their latest one is "The Rightful Return of Van Jones") ARE YOU KIDDING ME????
    Actually, according to your first post I'd say that Fox News is the $1 burger and NPR is the filet mignon. Look at how many people eat $1 burgers!

    And what about ACORN? Are you talking about that silly video scandal in which the DA concluded:

    On September 15, 2009, my office began an investigation into possible criminality on the part of three ACORN employees. The three had been secretly videotaped by two people posing as a pimp and prostitute, who came to ACORN’S Brooklyn office, seeking advice about how to purchase a house with money generated by their ‘business.’ The ‘couple’ later made the recording public. That investigation is now concluded and no criminality has been found.
    Or are you talking about the voter fraud in '08 which was covered well by NPR?

    I'm sorry but Fox will lose any battle in which we tally; errors, gaffes, lack of coverage, or agenda pushing.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to commiecat For This Useful Post:

    NYCshaver (04-01-2010)

  8. #37
    Pit Bull Lover & Trout Terrorist hardblues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    307
    Thanked: 127

    Default

    Here is an interesting take on the topic of Fox news taken from Wiki that looks at if from another angle, essentially, that in part... the comparative differences between Fox's guest line-ups and it's competitors is due to the fact that the other outlets more often ignore the the conservative guests as follows:

    Ex-Fox-News personality Eric Burns has suggested in an interview that Fox "probably gives voice to more conservatives than the other networks. But not at the expense of liberals." Burns justifies a higher exposure of conservatives by saying that other media often ignore conservatives.

    Simply, another way of looking at it, or, something to take into consideration anyway...Perhaps their marking idea is in recognition that the many other networks and news sources leave a rather large void in the conservative market and they are capturing that market...as a center-right country that would seem intelligent business....I don't imagine Famous Dave's will be starting any outlets in Israel or Victoria's Secret is buying property in Saudi Arabia due to similar market studies...Know what I mean
    Last edited by hardblues; 04-01-2010 at 12:16 AM.
    Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

  9. #38
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Delta, Utah
    Posts
    372
    Thanked: 96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commiecat View Post
    Actually, according to your first post I'd say that Fox News is the $1 burger and NPR is the filet mignon. Look at how many people eat $1 burgers!
    He already answered that about 8 posts ago. For a refresher:

    comparing these to the news is apples and oranges. in both of these scenarios, there is more than just desire to consume written into the equation of consumption. Price is a key determining factor (especially in this economy). However, when it comes to news, you can just as easily decide to watch CNN, MSNBC, Headline News, or Fox, without any price issues. If you have cable tv, you have these channels, and can freely make a choice on what to watch.

    If a fillet mignon was the same price as a double cheese burger from McD's, then I am sure that the double cheese burger will cease to exist, unless changes are made to the double cheese burger. CNN, MSNBC, and headline news are not learning this lesson, and are simply trying to throw mud at Fox, calling Fox biased, while ignoring their own utterly liberally slanted reporting of the news.

  10. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commiecat View Post
    Actually, according to your first post I'd say that Fox News is the $1 burger and NPR is the filet mignon. Look at how many people eat $1 burgers!

    And what about ACORN? Are you talking about that silly video scandal in which the DA concluded:

    Or are you talking about the voter fraud in '08 which was covered well by NPR?

    I'm sorry but Fox will lose any battle in which we tally; errors, gaffes, lack of coverage, or agenda pushing.
    silly scandal that brought down the entire organization? yes. Silly scandal in which ACORN was complicit in using 15 year old girls in the sex trade? Yes. Voter fraud that ended up with criminal convictions? yes.

    Your DA quote was from one of the tapes. I am still waiting for all of the DA's to make their determination.

    I'm sorry, but Fox is the best. The rest are crap, unless you consider ignoring stories as great reporting.

  11. #40
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,430
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    I'm sorry, but Fox is the best.
    Best means #1, and I know you're a lawyer, so from now on all my TV watching will most certainly be Fox until they move down the ratings, if they ever do!

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to gugi For This Useful Post:

    hardblues (04-01-2010)

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •