Page 17 of 22 FirstFirst ... 7131415161718192021 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 218
Like Tree59Likes

Thread: Where Do We Draw The Line?

  1. #161
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,307
    Thanked: 3227

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commiecat View Post
    Who's that?
    Now that's a question and another can of worms for a whole other thread or three.

    Bob

  2. #162
    Senior Member Johnus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,979
    Thanked: 196

    Default

    The run up to the 2012 Presidential election has temporarily held off a worsening Worldwide Depression that will be devastating to all of us. A positive? Atleast till November.

  3. #163
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    33,057
    Thanked: 5021
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnus View Post
    The run up to the 2012 Presidential election has temporarily held off a worsening Worldwide Depression that will be devastating to all of us. A positive? Atleast till November.
    Are you saying there is someone so powerful he can control the worlds economic system at his will?

  4. #164
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur View Post
    Are you saying there is someone so powerful he can control the worlds economic system at his will?
    Another reference to the Head of Marketing?

  5. #165
    Easily distracted by sharp objects alb1981's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Tempe, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    824
    Thanked: 94

    Default

    So anyone hear about Obama signing legislation making it a felony to protest the president/elected leaders? free speach anyone?? just saying...

  6. #166
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alb1981 View Post
    So anyone hear about Obama signing legislation making it a felony to protest the president/elected leaders? free speach anyone?? just saying...
    Yes, I heard about this and there is almost no coverage and absolutely no protest of the First Amendment violation.

    The First Amendment was put there to protect political speech above all other type of speech.

    McCain Feingold was a clear violation also.

  7. #167
    Senior Member blabbermouth 1OldGI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    New Port Richey, FL
    Posts
    3,819
    Thanked: 1185
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
    Yes, I heard about this and there is almost no coverage and absolutely no protest of the First Amendment violation.

    The First Amendment was put there to protect political speech above all other type of speech.

    McCain Feingold was a clear violation also.
    Crotalus, my friend, the writing is on the wall, it's re-education camp for us. His next piece of legislation will likely be the classic "I'm President for Life" manuever.

  8. #168
    Seudo Intellectual Lazarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Denver,CO
    Posts
    429
    Thanked: 166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alb1981 View Post
    So anyone hear about Obama signing legislation making it a felony to protest the president/elected leaders? free speach anyone?? just saying...
    He did no such thing. Just another manufactured controversy.


    FactCheck.org : Obama Criminalize Free Speech?

  9. #169
    This is not my actual head. HNSB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,623
    Thanked: 1371
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    factcheck.org leaves out the part that "willfully" was dropped from the language.

    The law had bipartisan support - being authored by a republican in the house and a democrat in the senate. Both parties overwhelmingly voted for it.
    Reading reports from sources slanted to both sides politically, it seems that the only people happy with the change to the law are the government. (how often do Fox news, Drudge, the Huffington post, and the ACLU all agree on anything?)


    Whether it's a manufactured controversy or not remains to be seen - it does seem that there is more room now for federal law enforcement to abuse the law.
    Any notion that one party or the other is responsible is ridiculous. Both parties worked together to make the change.

  10. #170
    Seudo Intellectual Lazarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Denver,CO
    Posts
    429
    Thanked: 166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HNSB View Post
    factcheck.org leaves out the part that "willfully" was dropped from the language.....
    No it doesn't. The second bullet point under the heading Manufactured Controversy clearly states: "The new law revises the standard that prosecutors must meet to gain a conviction, from proving that a violation was committed “willfully and knowingly” to merely proving that it was committed “knowingly.”

    In any event the point remains that the law in question had nothing to do with making it a felony to protest the president or elected leaders. Sometimes when something sounds too crazy to be true it is because it isn't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •