Results 61 to 70 of 1631
Hybrid View
-
03-11-2014, 02:33 PM #1
I currently own two watches that actually see use. My "nice" watch is a Citizen Eco Drive that my lovely wife surprised me with on our 5th wedding anniversary. I wear it at work and when out and about town.
My "knock-around" is an old Timex Ironman that has survived 3 deployments and countless abuses, but true to their motto "keeps on tickin".
-
03-11-2014, 08:47 PM #2
Just bought a Invicta Grand Diver 3045. Really wanted the 9937 but can't seem to get them in UK. Anyone had any experience? Really fancied a new automatic and it's got a seiko movement so can't be too bad.
Views appreciated.Never trust a man who, when left alone in a room with a tea cosy, doesn't try it on!
-
03-11-2014, 10:02 PM #3
I like the kind of "watch" that is inside my cellphone. I think that having a second watch is unpractical and doesn't serve any purpose. It is in the way and uncomfortable. It also increases the risk of injuries, just like other jewelry. Why do you like them? Am I wrong if I say that it is about having nice things, and showing that you have nice things? And not so much about that fact that it shows time? I Hope I don't stir something up, I am just interested in your opinions
-
03-11-2014, 10:12 PM #4
-
03-11-2014, 10:16 PM #5
I like mechanical and quartz. I like shiny and I like used. But, like my razors lately, I like pieces of history.
I have Vostoks, Poljot, Raketa, and Slava(Russian mechanicals). Like my Movado...
That being said, my daily beater is still a Casio PAW1300-- multi-band solar atomic quartz which does surprisingly accurate digital compass, barometer, altimeter, etc... Bullet proof, usefull watch, still holds its value. Hook yourself up with a nato strap and your good to go. I also like the Casio "fishing/hunting" quartz beaters. Pretty good for ideal fishing hunting time predictions, IMO.Last edited by Siguy; 03-11-2014 at 10:19 PM.
-
03-11-2014, 10:23 PM #6
I like watches & have thought about buying an expensive one, but I am rough on watches. I own several watches, none over $120.00. Mostly Casio, Timex & Swatch; I also have the Simpsons Burger King Collection & some of the Star Wars Burger King Collection. I damage them easily, so most have scratches on them. I would not leave the house without my watch. I feel that the timepiece on my left wrist is a watch, not the digital display in my phone.
I've never been injured by my Timex, but I would injure someone who tried to take it.
-
03-11-2014, 10:30 PM #7
For me I really enjoy the way all those tiny intricate bits work together and like it even more when you can see them (glass back automatics).
Far from finding them uncomfortable, I feel naked without a watch. I left my mobile phone at home accidentally and had a peaceful afternoon with an old school news paper. I didn't mind that one bit. If it had been my watch I would have turned around and gone back for it.
Mainly, it's a love of the mechanics of it. I just find them fascinating little bits of engineering. Look at Seiko 5 watches, probably never touched by a human hand until packing but bullet proof automatic movements which will go 20 years without a service and be no worse for it.
Another first for from my grandfather too, a solid gold Garrard automatic watch. Never worn it, never been serviced and after 31 years of being in existence it keeps time perfectly.Never trust a man who, when left alone in a room with a tea cosy, doesn't try it on!
-
03-13-2014, 01:54 PM #8
Ludvig,
A very valid query sir!
I like wearing a watch for both the practical and aesthetic aspects. In my field, I often work one on one with clients and families. To me, it would be disrespectful to pull out my phone to check the time in front of them, whereas a casual glance at my watch it much less interrupting or insulting. Not saying it's more discreet (though it is), but it's clear when I look at my watch that I'm not checking for a text message or SRP notification, just minding the time. I also use the chronograph on a frequent basis when administering timed portions of tests or to time a session with a client.
To me a watch, be it a fine timepiece or a common workhorse, is yet another thing we are sadly "losing" as our lives become ever more integrated with technology. I'm no Luddite by any means, but I guess I'm reluctant to embrace my phone as a "do it all". In my experience when one relies too heavily on one item for a multitude of tasks for the sake of convenience, it also increases the degree of inconvenience when said item does fail or is unavailable.
There are also many times when I don't have my cell phone "on me", so a watch is more convenient. Yes, I suppose your point about injuries is a good one, but most of us put a piece of razor sharp steel to our faces on a daily basis, so why worry.
-
03-11-2014, 10:40 PM #9
I don't have one yet, but I'm on the hunt for an Invicta 8928ob. I think they are beautiful: Invicta 8928 Watches,Men's Automatic Pro DIver, Men's Invicta Automatic Watches
State v. Durham, 323 N.W. 2d 243, 245 (Iowa 1982) (holding that a straight razor is per se a "dangerous weapon").
-
03-11-2014, 10:53 PM #10
Have a look at the Invicta Grand Diver 3045. It was one of those 'I really shouldn't but I'm going to' moments. I'm putting some money away (if I can with a baby due in 3 weeks) for a Longines automatic. I'd go for another omega but having seen just what a toddler can do to one when you're not looking is keeping me under £1000.
Never trust a man who, when left alone in a room with a tea cosy, doesn't try it on!