Results 1 to 10 of 55
Hybrid View
-
09-03-2010, 01:44 AM #1
-
09-03-2010, 02:08 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267I got it from a very reliable source that a diamond plate should be used and the results would be the best possible from most stones. He insists that it is possible to sharpen a plane well enough that one could read through the curl that is produced using the above procedure.
Later,
Richard
-
09-03-2010, 02:20 AM #3
I'm curious, Does anyone use their J-nats with just water, without a slurry stone?
I get great results off my Nakayama Asagi with just water. ( I do have matching slurries, or Tomonagura) As previously mentioned, The razor is shave ready. The J nat just takes it to another level. I also agree that you should stick with one stone for a while and get to know it...The kiita is a good choice..or the Maruka....I'd get your razor shave ready, then try the Kiita again, Try it without a slurry, see how it does....Last edited by zib; 09-03-2010 at 02:25 AM.
We have assumed control !
-
09-03-2010, 02:31 AM #4
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- St. Louis, Missouri, United States
- Posts
- 8,454
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 4942
-
09-03-2010, 02:34 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267I have used just water on an Asagi and have found that the razor is very keen. For me, just water polishes the edge and the bevel at the same time. I think of the slurry as a polisher of the bevel but ever so slightly rounds the keenness off, which I like. I am convinced that I am able to adjust the two different parts of a razor's edge, the bevel and the cutting edge, to my liking.
Later,
Richard
-
09-03-2010, 02:37 AM #6
-
09-03-2010, 04:30 AM #7“The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”
-
09-03-2010, 05:21 AM #8
I think that depends on how fine the slurry stone you used is. I think some people advise the use of a diamond plate to ensure that the slurry formed is 100% from the finishing stone. Whereas if you used a small piece of similar stone the slurry will be some mix of the slurry stone and the larger finishing stone. This is not so much of an issue if you are using a really fine (as fine as the finisher) slurry stone, but can be if it's not quite as fine as your base stone. There are also less variables when you use a diamond plate, since you know that the slurry comes 100% from the finisher so you're not wondering if the results are from the slurry stone or your stone.
I hope that all made sense.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to StraightRazorDave For This Useful Post:
riooso (09-03-2010)
-
09-03-2010, 05:49 AM #9“The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”
-
09-03-2010, 05:57 AM #10
Sorry, didn't catch that. Nagura would definitely be scratchier and coarser. They still have their place, but don't compare to the final finish of the finishing stone.
There's something I don't quite like about using a diamond plate to produce the final slurry....I think it's just the idea of using a big hunk of man made metal on a beautiful natural stone. Sort of ruins the zen of honing on a natural for me.